Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31885686›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2019

Unpaired Low-Dose CT Denoising Network Based on Cycle-Consistent Generative Adversarial Network with Prior Image Information.

Chao Tang, Jie Li, Linyuan Wang, Ziheng Li, Lingyun Jiang, Ailong Cai, Wenkun Zhang, Ningning Liang, Lei Li, Bin Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Systematic Review on Learning-based Spectral CT.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. CycleGAN-based deep learning technique for artifact reduction in fundus photography.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chao TangPLA Strategy Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450001, China.
Jie LiPLA Strategy Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450001, China.
Linyuan WangPLA Strategy Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1087-5911
Ziheng LiPLA Strategy Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450001, China.
Lingyun JiangPLA Strategy Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450001, China.
Ailong CaiPLA Strategy Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450001, China.
Wenkun ZhangPLA Strategy Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450001, China.
Ningning LiangPLA Strategy Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450001, China.
Lei LiPLA Strategy Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450001, China.
Bin YanPLA Strategy Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8268-559X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread application of X-ray computed tomography (CT) in clinical diagnosis has led to increasing public concern regarding excessive radiation dose administered to patients. However, reducing the radiation dose will inevitably cause server noise and affect radiologists' judgment and confidence. Hence, progressive low-dose CT (LDCT) image reconstruction methods must be developed to improve image quality. Over the past two years, deep learning-based approaches have shown impressive performance in noise reduction for LDCT images. Most existing deep learning-based approaches usually require the paired training dataset which the LDCT images correspond to the normal-dose CT (NDCT) images one-to-one, but the acquisition of well-paired datasets requires multiple scans, resulting the increase of radiation dose. Therefore, well-paired datasets are not readily available. To resolve this problem, this paper proposes an unpaired LDCT image denoising network based on cycle generative adversarial networks (CycleGAN) with prior image information which does not require a one-to-one training dataset. In this method, cyclic loss, an important trick in unpaired image-to-image translation, promises to map the distribution from LDCT to NDCT by using unpaired training data. Furthermore, to guarantee the accurate correspondence of the image content between the output and NDCT, the prior information obtained from the result preprocessed using the LDCT image is integrated into the network to supervise the generation of content. Given the map of distribution through the cyclic loss and the supervision of content through the prior image loss, our proposed method can not only reduce the image noise but also retain critical information. Real-data experiments were carried out to test the performance of the proposed method. The peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) improves by more than 3 dB, and the structural similarity (SSIM) increases when compared with the original CycleGAN without prior information. The real LDCT data experiment demonstrates the superiority of the proposed method according to both visual inspection and quantitative evaluation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsComputational BiologyDeep LearningHumansModels, StatisticalRadiation DosageRadiographic Image EnhancementRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSignal-To-Noise RatioSwineTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID31885686
PMCPMC6925923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.