Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31885679›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2019

Biases in the Simulation and Analysis of Fractal Processes.

Clément Roume, Samar Ezzina, Hubert Blain, Didier Delignières

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Subtle to significant: Enhancing heaviness perception with stochastic resonance.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A guide to Whittle maximum likelihood estimator in MATLAB.Frontiers in network physiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Clément RoumeEuromov, University Montpellier, 700 Avenue du Pic Saint Loup, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Samar EzzinaEuromov, University Montpellier, 700 Avenue du Pic Saint Loup, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Hubert BlainEuromov, University Montpellier, 700 Avenue du Pic Saint Loup, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Didier DelignièresEuromov, University Montpellier, 700 Avenue du Pic Saint Loup, 34090 Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7204-2272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fractal processes have recently received a growing interest, especially in the domain of rehabilitation. More precisely, the evolution of fractality with aging and disease, suggesting a loss of complexity, has inspired a number of studies that tried, for example, to entrain patients with fractal rhythms. This kind of study requires relevant methods for generating fractal signals and for assessing the fractality of the series produced by participants. In the present work, we engaged a cross validation of three methods of generation and three methods of analysis. We generated exact fractal series with the Davies-Harte (DH) algorithm, the spectral synthesis method (SSM), and the ARFIMA simulation method. The series were analyzed by detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA), power spectral density (PSD) method, and ARFIMA modeling. Results show that some methods of generation present systematic biases: DH presented a strong bias toward white noise in fBm series close to the 1/

Indexed as

Computer SimulationFractalsAlgorithmsBiasComputational BiologyHumansModels, TheoreticalRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID31885679
PMCPMC6914972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.