Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31885673›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2019

Are Kidney-Tonifying and Blood-Activating Medicinal Herbs Better than NSAIDs for Knee Osteoarthritis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hetao Huang, Jianke Pan, Weiyi Yang, Yanhong Han, Minghui Luo, Haodong Liang, Lingfeng Zeng, Guihong Liang, Jiongtong Lin, Jun Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hetao HuangSecond School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6197-1375
Jianke PanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Weiyi YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8657-2269
Yanhong HanSecond School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-5591
Minghui LuoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Haodong LiangGuangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510130, China.
Lingfeng ZengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Guihong LiangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-2628
Jiongtong LinSecond School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7592-728X
Jun LiuSecond School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1943-3880

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of kidney-tonifying and blood-activating medicinal herbs (KTBAMs) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) from online databases that compared the efficacy of KTBAMs and NSAIDs in the treatment of KOA were retrieved. The main outcomes included the evaluation of functional outcomes, pain, and adverse effects. The Cochrane risk-of-bias (ROB) tool was used to assess methodological quality.

resultsA total of 38 RCTs (3994 participants) were included in our meta-analysis. We found that KTBAMs had a significantly higher total effective rate (

conclusionKTBAMs were superior to NSAIDs in terms of a higher total effective rate, a lower adverse reaction rate, and a higher KSS score. There were no significant differences between KTBAMs and NSAIDs in improving VAS scores, WOMAC scores, and Lequence scores of patients with KOA. Therefore, KTBAMs may be an alternative effective method for treating KOA. However, high-quality, well-designed RCTs with long-term follow-up are still required.

Identifiers

PMID31885673
PMCPMC6899304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.