ArticleIEEE transactions on industrial informatics2019
A Model-Based Recurrent Neural Network With Randomness for Efficient Control With Applications.
Article in IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deformable and Fragile Object Manipulation: A Review and Prospects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Three-Dimensional Dense Reconstruction: A Review of Algorithms and Datasets.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Deep causal learning for robotic intelligence.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2023Review
- International trade and finance exploration using network model of computer trade platform.PloS one · 2021Article
- Deep Recurrent Neural Networks Based Obstacle Avoidance Control for Redundant Manipulators.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) control schemes for redundant manipulators have been extensively studied. These control schemes demonstrate superior computational efficiency, control precision, and control robustness. However, they lack planning completeness. This paper explains why RNN control schemes suffer from the problem. Based on the analysis, this work presents a new random RNN control scheme, which 1) introduces randomness into RNN to address the planning completeness problem, 2) improves control precision with a new optimization target, 3) improves planning efficiency through learning from exploration. Theoretical analyses are used to prove the global stability, the planning completeness, and the computational complexity of the proposed method. Software simulation is provided to demonstrate the improved robustness against noise, the planning completeness and the improved planning efficiency of the proposed method over benchmark RNN control schemes. Real-world experiments are presented to demonstrate the application of the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.