Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31885349›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of international medical research2020

Efficacy of erlotinib as neoadjuvant regimen in EGFR-mutant locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Liwen Xiong, Yuqing Lou, Hao Bai, Rong Li, Jinjing Xia, Wentao Fang, Jie Zhang, Han Han-Zhang, Analyn Lizaso, Bing Li and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of international medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapy in Resectable NSCLC: Current and Future Perspectives.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Liwen XiongDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yuqing LouDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hao BaiDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Rong LiDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jinjing XiaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Wentao FangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jie ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Han Han-ZhangBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Analyn LizasoBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Bing LiBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Aiqin GuDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Baohui HanDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3950-3030

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal neoadjuvant regimen for locally advanced resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. EGFR inhibitors have significantly improved survival in patients with

methodThirty-one treatment-naïve Chinese patients with stage IIIA NSCLC were enrolled. Patients without

resultsAfter completing neoadjuvant treatment, 12 and 8 patients from the N-TKI and N-chemo groups underwent surgery, respectively. Our data revealed that patients who received erlotinib had a marginally better clinical objective response rate (67% vs. 19%), pathological response rate (67% vs. 38%), and overall survival (51.0 months vs. 20.9 months) compared with those who received chemotherapy. Furthermore, patients in the N-TKI group had a significantly greater reduction in tumor diameter, serum carcinoembryonic level, and maximum allelic fraction.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate that erlotinib is an effective neoadjuvant regimen in patients with

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideHumansMutationNeoadjuvant TherapyProtein Kinase InhibitorsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideProtein Kinase InhibitorsAdenocarcinomachemotherapyEGFR-TKIerlotiniblocally advancedneoadjuvantstage IIIA

Identifiers

PMID31885349
PMCPMC7607055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.