Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31884912›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Chemosensing versus mechanosensing in nodal and Kupffer's vesicle cilia and in other left-right organizer organs.

Julyan H E Cartwright, Oreste Piro, Idan Tuval

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Mechanics of Development.Developmental cell · 2021
    Review
  9. Passively parallel regularized stokeslets.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. On the unity and diversity of cilia.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julyan H E CartwrightInstituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra, CSIC-Universidad de Granada, 18100 Armilla, Granada, Spain.
Oreste PiroDepartamento de Física, Universitat de les Illes Balears, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Idan TuvalDepartamento de Física, Universitat de les Illes Balears, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Mediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies · ESUniversidad de Granada · ESUniversitat de les Illes Balears · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How is sensing carried out by cilia in the mouse node, zebrafish Kupffer's vesicle and similar left-right (LR) organizer organs in other species? Two possibilities have been put forward. In the former, cilia would detect some chemical species in the fluid; in the latter, they would detect fluid flow. In either case, the hypothesis is that an imbalance would be detected between this signalling coming from cilia on the left and right sides of the organizer, which would initiate a cascade of signals leading ultimately to the breaking of LR symmetry in the developing body plan of the organism. We review the evidence for both hypotheses. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Unity and diversity of cilia in locomotion and transport'.

Indexed as

AnimalsCiliaMiceSensationZebrafishchemosensingKupffer's vesicleleft–right organizermechanosensingnodeprimary cilia

Identifiers

PMID31884912
PMCPMC7017340
OpenAlexW2998082109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.