Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31884904›Full record

ArticleStroke2020

Deep Learning Detection of Penumbral Tissue on Arterial Spin Labeling in Stroke.

Kai Wang, Qinyang Shou, Samantha J Ma, David Liebeskind, Xin J Qiao, Jeffrey Saver, Noriko Salamon, Hosung Kim, Yannan Yu, Yuan Xie and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Big Data in Stroke: How to Use Big Data to Make the Next Management Decision.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kai WangFrom the Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles (K.W., Q.S., S.J.M., H.K., D.J.J.W.).
Qinyang ShouFrom the Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles (K.W., Q.S., S.J.M., H.K., D.J.J.W.).
Samantha J MaFrom the Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles (K.W., Q.S., S.J.M., H.K., D.J.J.W.).
David LiebeskindDepartment of Neurology (D.L., J.S., F.S.), University of California, Los Angeles.
Xin J QiaoDepartment of Radiology (X.J.Q., N.S.), University of California, Los Angeles.
Jeffrey SaverDepartment of Neurology (D.L., J.S., F.S.), University of California, Los Angeles.
Noriko SalamonDepartment of Radiology (X.J.Q., N.S.), University of California, Los Angeles.
Hosung KimFrom the Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles (K.W., Q.S., S.J.M., H.K., D.J.J.W.).
Yannan YuDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (Y.Y., Y.X., G.Z.).
Yuan XieDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (Y.Y., Y.X., G.Z.).
Greg ZaharchukDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (Y.Y., Y.X., G.Z.).
Fabien ScalzoDepartment of Neurology (D.L., J.S., F.S.), University of California, Los Angeles.
Danny J J WangFrom the Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles (K.W., Q.S., S.J.M., H.K., D.J.J.W.).

Funding

TR&D3: Intrinsic Surface MappingP41EB015922 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VAN HORN, JOHN DARRELL · 2012 to 2022
$14.1M
Quantifying Collateral Perfusion in Cerebrovascular DiseaseR01NS066506 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ZAHARCHUK, GREGORY GEORGE · 2009 to 2017
$4.9M
Imaging Cerebral and Retinal Microvasculature in Cerebral Small Vessel DiseaseUH3NS100614 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KASHANI, AMIR H, RINGMAN, JOHN M · 2018 to 2020
$4.3M
Imaging Cerebral and Retinal Microvasculature in Cerebral Small Vessel DiseaseUH2NS100614 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KASHANI, AMIR H, RINGMAN, JOHN M · 2016 to 2017
$2.4M
Multiband ASL for Neurodevelopment StudyR01EB028297 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI WANG, DANNY JJ · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028297NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS066506NINDS NIH HHS UH2 NS100614NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS100614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Selection of patients with acute ischemic stroke for endovascular treatment generally relies on dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography perfusion. Dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging requires injection of contrast, whereas computed tomography perfusion requires high doses of ionizing radiation. The purpose of this work was to develop and evaluate a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm for assisting the selection of suitable patients with acute ischemic stroke for endovascular treatment based on 3-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL). Methods- A total of 167 image sets of 3-dimensional pCASL data from 137 patients with acute ischemic stroke scanned on 1.5T and 3.0T Siemens MR systems were included for neural network training. The concurrently acquired dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging was used to produce labels of hypoperfused brain regions, analyzed using commercial software. The DL and 6 machine learning (ML) algorithms were trained with 10-fold cross-validation. The eligibility for endovascular treatment was determined retrospectively based on the criteria of perfusion/diffusion mismatch in the DEFUSE 3 trial (Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke). The trained DL algorithm was further applied on twelve 3-dimensional pCASL data sets acquired on 1.5T and 3T General Electric MR systems, without fine-tuning of parameters. Results- The DL algorithm can predict the dynamic susceptibility contrast-defined hypoperfusion region in pCASL with a voxel-wise area under the curve of 0.958, while the 6 ML algorithms ranged from 0.897 to 0.933. For retrospective determination for subject-level endovascular treatment eligibility, the DL algorithm achieved an accuracy of 92%, with a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.95. When applied to the GE pCASL data, the DL algorithm achieved a voxel-wise area under the curve of 0.94 and a subject-level accuracy of 92% for endovascular treatment eligibility. Conclusions- pCASL perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in conjunction with the DL algorithm provides a promising approach for assisting decision-making for endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPerfusion ImagingBrain IschemiaCerebrovascular CirculationDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyRetrospective StudiesSpin LabelsStrokeSpin Labelsarterial spin labelingdeep learningmagnetic resonance imagingperfusion imagingstroke

Identifiers

PMID31884904
PMCPMC7224203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.