Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31884705›Full record

ArticleVox sanguinis2020

Knowledge, attitude and practices of obstetric care providers towards maternal red-blood-cell immunization during pregnancy.

Yolentha M Slootweg, Chawa Walg, Joke M Koelewijn, Inge L Van Kamp, Masja De Haas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vox sanguinis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yolentha M SlootwegDepartment of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8209-7237
Chawa WalgDepartment of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Joke M KoelewijnDepartment of Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0532-0022
Inge L Van KampDepartment of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7856-3397
Masja De HaasDepartment of Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLSanquin · NL

Funding

Sanquin Blood Supply PPOD 14-15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesA successful routine RBC alloantibody screening programme should not lead to unnecessary emotional burden during pregnancy due to inadequate counselling on the risk of severe haemolytic disease of the foetus and the newborn (HDFN). Rareness of this disease may result in insufficient knowledge and subsequent inadequate information transfer to women, diagnosed with RBC antibodies. We investigated the current knowledge, views and experiences of Dutch obstetric care providers regarding RBC alloimmunization during pregnancy. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a quantitative cross-sectional study, using a structured digital questionnaire to measure knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) regarding maternal RBC alloimmunization among Dutch obstetric care providers in 2016.

resultsAbout 10% of obstetric care providers completed the questionnaire. A sufficient level of knowledge was found in 7% of all participants (N = 329). Knowledge about RhD immunisation and prophylaxis was sufficient in 60% of the responders. Knowledge gaps were found concerning the relevance of non-RhD RBC antibodies, the indications for giving extra RhD prophylaxis and the interpretation of laboratory test results. Healthcare providers estimated their own level of knowledge 'sufficient' (primary/secondary care) to 'good' (tertiary care), and all participants considered their professional role important within the screening programme.

conclusionDutch obstetric care providers showed a lack of knowledge regarding maternal RBC immunization. Awareness of the lack of knowledge is necessary to help obstetric care providers to be careful in giving information and even to decide to contact the expert centre before counselling the patient.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesErythroblastosis, FetalFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIsoantibodiesMass ScreeningNetherlandsObstetricsPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesIsoantibodiesblood groupshaemolytic disease of the foetus and newbornquality managementRBC antigens and antibodies

Identifiers

PMID31884705
PMCPMC7187211
OpenAlexW2998513392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.