Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31884682›Full record

Trial reportHealth services research2020

Eight-year post-trial follow-up of health care and long-term care costs of tele-based health coaching.

Erja Mustonen, Iiris Hörhammer, Pilvikki Absetz, Kristiina Patja, Johanna Lammintakanen, Martti Talja, Risto Kuronen, Miika Linna

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Supporting Sustainable Health Behavior Change: The Whole is Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Erja MustonenPäijät-Häme Joint Authority for Health and Wellbeing, Lahti, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7365-5855
Iiris HörhammerHealthcare Engineering, Management and Architecture Institute, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland.
Pilvikki AbsetzUniversity of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Kristiina PatjaDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Johanna LammintakanenUniversity of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3333-1661
Martti TaljaPäijät-Häme Joint Authority for Health and Wellbeing, Lahti, Finland.
Risto KuronenPäijät-Häme Joint Authority for Health and Wellbeing, Lahti, Finland.
Miika LinnaHealthcare Engineering, Management and Architecture Institute, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland.
Päijät-Hämeen Keskussairaala · FIAalto University · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the long-term effect of telephone health coaching on health care and long-term care (LTC) costs in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingRandomized controlled trial (RCT) data were linked to Finnish national health and social care registries and electronic health records (EHR). Post-trial eight-year economic evaluation was conducted. STUDY

designA total of 1,535 patients (≥45 years) were randomized to the intervention (n = 1034) and control groups (n = 501). The intervention group received monthly telephone health coaching for 12 months. Usual health care and LTC were provided for both groups. PRINCIPAL

findingsIntention-to-treat analysis showed no significant change in total health and long-term care costs (intervention effect €1248 [3 percent relative reduction], CI -6347 to 2217) in the intervention compared to the control group. There were also no significant changes among subgroups of patients with T2D or CAD.

conclusionsHealth coaching had a nonsignificant effect on health care and long-term care costs in the 8-year follow-up among patients with T2D or CAD. More research is needed to study, which patient groups, at which state of the disease trajectory of T2D and cardiovascular disease, would best benefit from health coaching.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCoronary Artery DiseaseDelivery of Health CareDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFinlandFollow-Up StudiesForecastingHumansLong-Term CareMaleMentoringMiddle AgedTelemedicineTelephonecoronary artery diseasecostseffectivenesshealth coachingtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31884682
PMCPMC7080381
OpenAlexW2997995999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.