Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31884467›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2020

A Latent Transition Analysis Model to Assess Change in Cognitive States over Three Occasions: Results from the Rush Memory and Aging Project.

Andrea R Zammit, David A Bennett, Charles B Hall, Richard B Lipton, Mindy J Katz, Graciela Muniz-Terrera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Using Mixture Modeling to Construct Subgroups of Cognitive Aging in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea R ZammitAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
David A BennettRush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Charles B HallAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Richard B LiptonAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Mindy J KatzAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Graciela Muniz-TerreraUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Vascular Structure and Function in Cognitive AgingP01AG003949 · NIA · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI mindy katz · 1985 to 2026
$73.9M
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF NEURAL RESERVE AND NEUROBIOLOGY IN AGINGR01AG017917 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN · 2001 to 2023
$43.3M
Epidemiologic Study of TDP-43 Pathology in Aging and DementiaR01AG042210 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHNEIDER, JULIE A. · 2012 to 2018
$2.4M
Application of latent and integrative approaches to understand the spectrum of cognitive agingK01AG054700 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZAMMIT, ANDREA ROSE · 2017 to 2021
$653k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG054700NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003949NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017917NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConceptualizing cognitive aging as a step-sequential process is useful in identifying particular stages of cognitive function and impairment.

objectiveWe applied latent transition analysis (LTA) to determine 1) whether the underlying structure of cognitive profiles found at every measurement occasion are uniform across three waves of assessment, 2) whether class-instability is predictive of distal outcomes, and 3) whether class-reversions from impaired to non-impaired using latent modelling is lower than when using clinical criteria of mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

methodsA mover-stayer LTA model with dementia as a distal outcome was specified to model transitions of ten neuropsychological measures over three annual waves in the Rush Memory and Aging Project (n = 1,661). The predictive validity of the mover-stayer status for incident Alzheimer's disease (AD) was then assessed.

resultsWe identified a five-class model across the three time-points: Mixed-Domain Impairment, Memory-Specific Impairment, Frontal Impairment, Average, and Superior Cognition. None of the individuals in the Impairment classes reverted to the Average or Superior classes. Conventional MCI classification identified 26.4% and 14.1% at Times 1 and 2 as false-positive cases. "Movers" had 87% increased risk of developing dementia compared to those classified as "Stayers".

conclusionOur findings support the use of latent variable modelling that incorporates comprehensive neuropsychological assessment to identify and classify cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAlzheimer DiseaseCognitionCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleMemoryMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsAlzheimer’s diseasecognitive heterogeneitycognitive profilescognitive statusdementiaindividual differenceslatent transition analysisneuropsychological profiles

Identifiers

PMID31884467
PMCPMC7034515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.