Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31884376›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2020

Identifying smoker subgroups with high versus low smoking cessation attempt probability: A decision tree analysis approach.

Hua-Hie Yong, Chandan Karmakar, Ron Borland, Shitanshu Kusmakar, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, John Yearwood

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Age-Related Interactions on Key Theoretical Determinants of Smoking Cessation: Findings from the ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys (2016-2020).Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hua-Hie YongSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. Electronic address: hua.yong@deakin.edu.au.
Chandan KarmakarSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Ron BorlandSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Shitanshu KusmakarSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Matthew Fuller-TyszkiewiczSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
John YearwoodSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Deakin University · AUAustralian Psychological Society · AU

Funding

Project 3: Policy Effects on Cigarette Design, Emissions &BehaviorP50CA111236 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI CUMMINGS, KENNETH MICHAEL · 2004 to 2009
$8.2M
International Tobacco Policy SurveyR01CA100362 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO · PI FONG, GEOFFREY T · 2005 to 2013
$4.7M
Cancer Research UK C312/A3726NCI NIH HHS P50 CA111236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegression-based research has successfully identified independent predictors of smoking cessation, both its initiation and maintenance. However, it is unclear how these various independent predictors interact with each other and conjointly influence smoking behaviour. As a proof-of-concept, this study used decision tree analysis (DTA) to identify the characteristics of smoker subgroups with high versus low smoking cessation initiation probability based on the conjoint effects of four predictor variables, and determine any variations by socio-economic status (SES).

methodsData come from the Australian arm of the ITC project, a longitudinal cohort study of adult smokers followed up approximately annually. Reported wanting to quit smoking, worries about smoking negative health impact, quitting self-efficacy and quit intentions assessed in 2005 were used as predictors and reported quit attempts at the 2006 follow-up survey were used as the outcome for the initial model calibration and validation analyses (n = 1475), and further cross-validated using the 2012-2013 data (n = 787).

resultsDTA revealed that while all four predictor variables conjointly contributed to the identification of subgroups with high versus low smoking cessation initiation probability, quit intention was the most important predictor common across all SES strata. The relative importance of the other predictors showed differences by SES.

conclusionsModifiable characteristics of smoker subgroups associated with making a quit attempt and any variations by SES can be successfully identified using a decision tree analysis approach, to provide insights as to who might benefit from targeted intervention, thus, underscoring the value of this approach to complement the conventional regression-based approach.

Indexed as

Decision TreesSocial ClassAdolescentAdultAustraliaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProbabilityProof of Concept StudySmokersSmoking CessationYoung AdultAdult smokersDecision tree analysisSmoking cessation attemptsSocio-economic status

Identifiers

PMID31884376
PMCPMC6957357
OpenAlexW2995190009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.