Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31884333›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of nursing studies2020

A new conceptual model of experiences of aging in place in the United States: Results of a systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies.

Amy Rosenwohl-Mack, Karen Schumacher, Min-Lin Fang, Yoshimi Fukuoka

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of nursing studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy Rosenwohl-MackDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), 3333 California St, Suite 455, San Francisco, CA 94118, United States. Electronic address: amy.rosenwohl-mack@ucsf.edu.
Karen SchumacherDepartment of Physiological Nursing, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, 2 Koret Way, N631, San Francisco CA 94143, United States. Electronic address: karen.schumacher@ucsf.edu.
Min-Lin FangEducation and Research Services, UCSF Library, University of California, San Francisco, 530 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States. Electronic address: min-lin.fang@ucsf.edu.
Yoshimi FukuokaDepartment of Physiological Nursing, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, 2 Koret Way, N631, San Francisco CA 94143, United States. Electronic address: yoshimi.fukuoka@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Mentoring and research in applying digital technologies to prevent chronic IllnessesK24NR015812 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FUKUOKA, YOSHIMI · 2015 to 2020
$930k
NINR NIH HHS K24 NR015812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the evidence on experiences of aging in place in the United States.

designSystematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies. DATA SOURCES: We searched six bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Sociological Abstracts), with no limits on publication date. Eligible studies reported peer-reviewed qualitative research on experiences of aging in place in the United States with full-text available in English. REVIEW

methodsThree reviewers independently used Covidence software to screen titles and abstracts followed by full texts. We assessed quality and risk of bias using a modified version of the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Qualitative Research. Qualitative data analysis was conducted using meta-ethnography, following Noblit and Hare's seven-step method of translation and synthesis to generate a novel conceptual model.

resultsOf 2659 papers screened, 37 unique studies were eligible for inclusion, reported in 38 publications. The studies were conducted in 16 states and published between 1994 and 2018. The included samples represented 1199 participants in total, with mean ages ranging from 48 to 91 years. The gender of the samples ranged from 20% to 100% female, with a median of 77%. One-third of the included studies did not report participants' race/ethnicity, and half of the remaining study samples were at least 90% white; however, 20% of the studies focused exclusively on experiences of racial/ethnic minority older adults. Using meta-ethnography, we developed a new conceptual model of aging in place in the United States as a dynamic process of balancing threats and agency in relation to experiences of identity, connectedness, and place. We found that people aging in place were engaged in significant work to cope with unpredictable needs and challenges by changing their mindset, adapting their home environment to accommodate new needs, and finding different ways to connect with important people in their lives. Agency was shaped by resources and restrictions on choice, and where threats to aging in place outweighed an individual's sense of agency, the consequences included feelings of uncertainty, isolation, and dislocation.

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review of qualitative studies to evaluate experiences of aging in place in the United States. The findings of our meta-ethnographic synthesis led to the development of a new conceptual model of aging in place highlighting the dynamic tensions involved in balancing threats and agency.

Indexed as

AgingIndependent LivingAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUnited StatesAging at homeAging in communityAging in placeConceptual frameworkIndependent livingLiving aloneMeta-ethnographyOlder adultsQualitative researchSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31884333
PMCPMC7556794
OpenAlexW2992282938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.