Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31884057›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2020

Untangling the relatedness among correlations, part III: Inter-subject correlation analysis through Bayesian multilevel modeling for naturalistic scanning.

Gang Chen, Paul A Taylor, Xianggui Qu, Peter J Molfese, Peter A Bandettini, Robert W Cox, Emily S Finn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Anxiety Shapes Amygdala-Prefrontal Dynamics During Movie Watching.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gang ChenScientific and Statistical Computing Core, National Institute of Mental Health, USA. Electronic address: gangchen@mail.nih.gov.
Paul A TaylorScientific and Statistical Computing Core, National Institute of Mental Health, USA.
Xianggui QuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Oakland University, USA.
Peter J MolfeseSection on Functional Imaging Methods, National Institute of Mental Health, USA.
Peter A BandettiniSection on Functional Imaging Methods, National Institute of Mental Health, USA.
Robert W CoxScientific and Statistical Computing Core, National Institute of Mental Health, USA.
Emily S FinnSection on Functional Imaging Methods, National Institute of Mental Health, USA.

Funding

Scientific and Statistical Computing CoreZICMH002888 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI TAYLOR, PAUL · 2009 to 2025
$30.9M
Linking brain activity during naturalistic tasks to individual phenotypes on the depression spectrumR00MH120257 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI FINN, EMILY SUZANNE · 2020 to 2022
$747k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIC MH002888NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH120257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While inter-subject correlation (ISC) analysis is a powerful tool for naturalistic scanning data, drawing appropriate statistical inferences is difficult due to the daunting task of accounting for the intricate relatedness in data structure as well as handling the multiple testing issue. Although the linear mixed-effects (LME) modeling approach (Chen et al., 2017a) is capable of capturing the relatedness in the data and incorporating explanatory variables, there are a few challenging issues: 1) it is difficult to assign accurate degrees of freedom for each testing statistic, 2) multiple testing correction is potentially over-penalizing due to model inefficiency, and 3) thresholding necessitates arbitrary dichotomous decisions. Here we propose a Bayesian multilevel (BML) framework for ISC data analysis that integrates all regions of interest into one model. By loosely constraining the regions through a weakly informative prior, BML dissolves multiplicity through conservatively pooling the effect of each region toward the center and improves collective fitting and overall model performance. In addition to potentially achieving a higher inference efficiency, BML improves spatial specificity and easily allows the investigator to adopt a philosophy of full results reporting. A dataset of naturalistic scanning is utilized to illustrate the modeling approach with 268 parcels and to showcase the modeling capability, flexibility and advantages in results reporting. The associated program will be available as part of the AFNI suite for general use.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualBayes TheoremBrainHumansLinear ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID31884057
PMCPMC7299750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.