ReviewNeuroImage2020
Untangling the relatedness among correlations, part III: Inter-subject correlation analysis through Bayesian multilevel modeling for naturalistic scanning.
Review in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Go figure: transparency in neuroscience images preserves context and clarifies interpretation.Nature methods · 2026Review
- Prosodic recitation training selectively enhances sensorimotor connectivity during poetry reading: a longitudinal fNIRS study.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Individuals with Intermittent Explosive Disorder Exhibit Idiosyncratic Neural Responses during Social-emotional Processing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Differential fMRI neural synchrony associated with migraine during naturalistic stimuli with negative emotional valence.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Inter-subject correlation of audience facial expressions predicts audience engagement during theatrical performances.iScience · 2024Article
- Anxiety Shapes Amygdala-Prefrontal Dynamics During Movie Watching.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023Article
- Characterizing the spatiotemporal features of functional connectivity across the white matter and gray matter during the naturalistic condition.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- The polarized mind in context: Interdisciplinary approaches to the psychology of political polarization.The American psychologist · 2022Article
- The "Narratives" fMRI dataset for evaluating models of naturalistic language comprehension.Scientific data · 2021Article
- Idiosynchrony: From shared responses to individual differences during naturalistic neuroimaging.NeuroImage · 2020Review
- Fighting or embracing multiplicity in neuroimaging? neighborhood leverage versus global calibration.NeuroImage · 2020Article
- Individual Differences in Brain Responses: New Opportunities for Tailoring Health Communication Campaigns.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While inter-subject correlation (ISC) analysis is a powerful tool for naturalistic scanning data, drawing appropriate statistical inferences is difficult due to the daunting task of accounting for the intricate relatedness in data structure as well as handling the multiple testing issue. Although the linear mixed-effects (LME) modeling approach (Chen et al., 2017a) is capable of capturing the relatedness in the data and incorporating explanatory variables, there are a few challenging issues: 1) it is difficult to assign accurate degrees of freedom for each testing statistic, 2) multiple testing correction is potentially over-penalizing due to model inefficiency, and 3) thresholding necessitates arbitrary dichotomous decisions. Here we propose a Bayesian multilevel (BML) framework for ISC data analysis that integrates all regions of interest into one model. By loosely constraining the regions through a weakly informative prior, BML dissolves multiplicity through conservatively pooling the effect of each region toward the center and improves collective fitting and overall model performance. In addition to potentially achieving a higher inference efficiency, BML improves spatial specificity and easily allows the investigator to adopt a philosophy of full results reporting. A dataset of naturalistic scanning is utilized to illustrate the modeling approach with 268 parcels and to showcase the modeling capability, flexibility and advantages in results reporting. The associated program will be available as part of the AFNI suite for general use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.