ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2020
Counted cycles method to measure the block inception time of kiloHertz frequency mammalian motor nerve block.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatiotemporal parameters for energy efficient kilohertz-frequency nerve block with low onset response.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Effects of waveform shape and electrode material on KiloHertz frequency alternating current block of mammalian peripheral nerve.Bioelectronic medicine · 2022Article
- Quantitative comparisons of block thresholds and onset responses for charge-balanced kilohertz frequency waveforms.Journal of neural engineering · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKilohertz frequency alternating currents (KHFAC) produce rapid nerve conduction block of mammalian peripheral nerves and have potential clinical applications in reducing nerve hyperactivity. However, there are no experimental measurements of the block inception time (BIT) for the complete block of mammalian motor axons, i.e. the time from the start of delivery of the KHFAC to the axons reaching a fully blocked state. NEW
methodA "counted cycles" method (CCM) was designed to exploit characteristics of the onset response, which is typical of KHFAC block, to measure the BIT with a millisecond time resolution. Randomized and repeated experiments were conducted in an in-vivo rodent model, using trains of KHFAC over a range of complete cycle counts at three frequencies (10, 20, and 40 kHz).
resultsComplete motor nerve conduction block was obtained in the rat sciatic nerve (N = 4) with an average BIT range of 5 ms-10 ms. The fastest BIT measured was 2.5 ms-5 ms. There was no statistical difference between the block inception times for the three frequencies tested. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
methodsThere are no comparable methods to measure the KHFAC BIT.
conclusionThe KHFAC BIT is faster than previously estimated. KHFAC motor nerve block is established in milliseconds. These results may assist in the design of methods to eliminate the onset response produced by KHFAC nerve block.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.