ArticleBMC health services research2019
Patient safety culture in Peking University Cancer Hospital in China: baseline assessment and comparative analysis for quality improvement.
Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- What Do We Know About Teamwork in Chinese Hospitals? A Systematic Review.Frontiers in public health · 2021Pooled it
- Patient Safety Culture: Current Status and Associated Factors Among Healthcare Workers at Kien An Hospital-Hai Phong, Vietnam-A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Assessment of the patient safety culture and the influencing factors among medical staff in a non-public tertiary general hospital in China.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- National insights into patient safety culture in Chinese psychiatric hospitals: the role of hospital-level disparities.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Career adaptability and patient safety culture perceptions among newly graduated oncology nurses: a latent profile analysis.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Patient safety culture assessment in five public hospitals of Sichuan Province: a cross-sectional study with HSOPSC 2.0.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Instruments for Patient Safety Assessment: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Assessment of patient safety culture among healthcare providers in tertiary hospitals in Malaysia-A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Factors determining safety culture in hospitals: a scoping review.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Patient Safety Culture Perception among Moroccan Healthcare professionals: Cross-Sectional Study in Public Hospitals.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2023Article
- Assessing patient safety culture in obstetrics ward: A pilot study using a modified Manchester Patient Safety Framework in China.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Palliative Care for Cancer Patients in Asia: Challenges and Countermeasures.Oncology reviews · 2023Review
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the revised surveys on patient safety culture™ (SOPS®) hospital survey 2.0.BMC nursing · 2022Article
- Article
- Assessment and analysis of patient safety competency of Chinese nurses with associate degrees: A cross-sectional study.Nursing open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLimited information is available regarding the patient safety culture in Chinese hospitals. This study aims to assess the patient safety culture in Peking University Cancer Hospital and to identify opportunities for improving the organization's safety culture.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in April 2018 and 2019, respectively. Data on patient safety culture were collected from clinical and administrative staffs using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC).
resultsTwelve composite dimension variables were hierarchically clustered. Three highest positive response dimensions include 'Organizational Learning and continuous improvement' (92.9%), 'Teamwork within units' (89.7%), and 'Hospital management support for patient safety' (83.7%), while 3 lowest positive response dimensions included 'Frequency of events reported' (43.9%), 'Non-punitive response to error' (51.1%), 'Communication openness' (52.2%), and 'Staffing' (53.7%). Compared to the average scores of the United States, the scores of the Peking University Cancer Hospital was significantly lower on 'Communication openness' and 'Frequency of events reported'. After targeted continuous improvement based on results in 2018, all 12 dimensions surprisingly increased in the safety culture conducted in 2019.
conclusionInadequate feedback and communications about error and lack of communication openness are key challenges for patient safety in the delivery of care in this hospital. Results of this baseline survey indicate the need for a modified approach and attention to context when designing interventions aimed at improving the safety culture in this organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.