Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31883510›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Optimising clinical effectiveness and quality along the atrial fibrillation anticoagulation pathway: an economic analysis.

Eoin Moloney, Dawn Craig, Nikki Holdsworth, Joanne Smithson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eoin MoloneyHealth Economics Group, Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle, NE2 4AX, UK. eoin.moloney@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3025-5413
Dawn CraigHealth Economics Group, Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle, NE2 4AX, UK.
Nikki HoldsworthAcademic Health Science Network North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle, UK.
Joanne SmithsonAcademic Health Science Network North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle, UK.

Funding

Pfizer-Bristol-Myers Squibb alliance N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. A service evaluation was carried out at an anticoagulation clinic in Newcastle upon-Tyne to explore the efficacy of introducing self-testing of anticoagulation status for AF patients on warfarin. The analysis presented aims to assess the potential cost savings and clinical outcomes associated with introducing self-testing at a clinic in the Northeast of England, and to determine the cost-effectiveness of a redesigned treatment pathway including genetic testing and self-testing components.

methodsQuestionnaires were administered to individuals participating in the service evaluation to understand the patient costs associated with clinical monitoring (139 patients), and quality-of-life before and after the introduction of self-testing (varying numbers). Additionally, data on time in therapeutic range (TTR) were captured at multiple time points to identify any change in outcome. Finally, an economic model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of introducing a redesigned treatment pathway, including genetic testing and self-testing, for AF patients.

resultsThe average cost per patient of attending the anticoagulation clinic was £16.24 per visit (including carer costs). Costs were higher amongst patients tested at the hospital clinic than those tested at the community clinic. Improvements in quality-of-life across all psychological topics, and improved TTR, were seen following the introduction of self-testing. Results of the cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the redesigned treatment pathway was less costly and more effective than current practice.

conclusionsAllowing AF patients on warfarin to self-test, rather than attend clinic to have their anticoagulation status assessed, has the potential to reduce patient costs. Additionally, self-testing may result in improved quality-of-life and TTR. Introducing genetic testing to guide patient treatment based on sensitivity to warfarin, and applying this in combination with self-testing, may also result in improved patient outcomes and reduced costs to the health service in the long-term.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAgedAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationEnglandFemaleHumansModels, EconomicQuality of Health CareStrokeSurveys and QuestionnairesWarfarinAnticoagulantsWarfarinAtrial fibrillationCost-effectivenessDirect oral anticoagulantsEconomic analysisWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID31883510
PMCPMC6935474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.