Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31883234›Full record

Observational studyCancer medicine2020

Patterns of distant metastases in 215 Merkel cell carcinoma patients: Implications for prognosis and surveillance.

Christopher W Lewis, Jamiluddin Qazi, Daniel S Hippe, Kristina Lachance, Hannah Thomas, Maclean M Cook, Ilsa Juhlin, Neha Singh, Zoe Thuesmunn, Seesha R Takagishi and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Spatially organized inflammatory myeloid-CD8bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Gross hematuria in an immunocompromised male - A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher W LewisDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jamiluddin QaziDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Daniel S HippeDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2427-4404
Kristina LachanceDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2697-268X
Hannah ThomasDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Maclean M CookDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ilsa JuhlinDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Neha SinghDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Zoe ThuesmunnDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Seesha R TakagishiDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Aubriana McEvoyDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Coley Doolittle-AmievaDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Shailender BhatiaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kelly G PaulsonDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ryan B O'MalleyDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Carolyn L WangDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Paul NghiemDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2784-963X
University of Washington · USSeattle Cancer Care Alliance · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian Esvelt · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Understand & overcome resistance to PD-1P01CA225517 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Cecilia C Yeung · 2019 to 2026
$22.7M
Pathogenetic and prognostic studies for improved therapy of Merkel cell carcinomaK24CA139052 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NGHIEM, PAUL · 2009 to 2018
$1.8M
Humoral and cellular immunity in polyomavirus-linked Merkel cell carcinomaR01CA162522 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NGHIEM, PAUL · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA139052NCI NIH HHS P01 CA225517NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS R01 CA162522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately one-third of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) patients eventually develop distant metastatic disease. Little is known about whether the location of the primary lesion is predictive of initial distant metastatic site, or if survival likelihood differs depending on the metastatic site. Such data could inform imaging/surveillance practices and improve prognostic accuracy. Multivariate and competing-risk analyses were performed on a cohort of 215 MCC patients with distant metastases, 31% of whom had two or more initial sites of distant metastasis. At time of initial distant metastasis in the 215 patients, metastatic sites (n = 305) included non-regional lymph nodes (present in 41% of patients), skin/body wall (25%), liver (23%), bone (21%), pancreas (8%), lung (7%), and brain (5%). Among the 194 patients who presented with MCC limited to local or regional sites (stage I-III) but who ultimately developed distant metastases, distant progression occurred in 49% by 1 year and in 80% by 2 years following initial diagnosis. Primary MCC locations differed in how likely they were to metastasize to specific organs/sites (P < .001). For example, liver metastases were far more likely from a head/neck primary (43% of 58 patients) versus a lower limb primary (5% of 39 patients; P < .0001). Skin-only distant metastasis was associated with lower MCC-specific mortality as compared to metastases in multiple organs/sites (HR 2.7; P = .003), in the liver (HR 2.1; P = .05), or in distant lymph nodes (HR 2.0; P = .045). These data reflect outcomes before PD1-pathway inhibitor availability, which may positively impact survival. In conclusion, primary MCC location is associated with a pattern of distant spread, which may assist in optimizing surveillance. Because it is linked to survival, the site of initial distant metastasis should be considered when assessing prognosis.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Merkel CellEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMerkel cell polyomavirusMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPolyomavirus InfectionsPrognosisRetrospective Studiescarcinomadermatologymedical oncologyMerkel cellneoplasm metastasisneoplasm stagingprognosisradiology

Identifiers

PMID31883234
PMCPMC7013053
OpenAlexW2997221179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.