Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31883208›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2019

Ankle proprioception during gait in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Charline Dambreville, Benoit Pairot de Fontenay, Andreanne K Blanchette, Jean-Sebastien Roy, Catherine Mercier, Laurent Bouyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charline DambrevilleCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation And Social Integration, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Benoit Pairot de FontenayCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation And Social Integration, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Andreanne K BlanchetteCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation And Social Integration, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Jean-Sebastien RoyCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation And Social Integration, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Catherine MercierCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation And Social Integration, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Laurent BouyerCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation And Social Integration, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2034-4516

Funding

CIHR MOP-125869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProprioception is known to be affected after a spinal cord injury (SCI). However, it is currently assessed during simple tasks that do not reflect activities of daily living. To better understand how proprioception affects movement, assessing it during a functional sensorimotor task such as walking is therefore of primary importance. Therefore, the objectives of this study were as follows: (a) measure the protocol reliability of a new robotic test in nondisabled controls; (b) evaluate the effect nonlesion-related factors such as sex, age, pain, and gait speed on ankle proprioception; and (c) assess ankle proprioception during walking in individuals with SCI.

methodsIn the current study, ankle proprioception was assessed during gait in individuals with an incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI; n = 15) using an electrohydraulic robotized ankle-foot orthosis (rAFO). Ankle proprioceptive threshold was quantified as the participants' ability to detect torque perturbations of varied amplitude applied during swing by the rAFO. In addition, test-retest reliability and the potential effect of nonlesion-related factors (sex, age, pain, and gait speed) were evaluated in nondisabled (ND; n = 65) participants.

resultsDuring gait, individuals with iSCI had a 53% poorer proprioceptive threshold than ND controls (p < .05). Test-retest reliability was good (ICC = 0.78), and only gait speed affected proprioceptive threshold (p = .018).

conclusionThis study is the first to show that ankle proprioception assessed during gait is impaired in individuals with an iSCI. The developed test can now be used to better characterize proprioception in population with other neurological conditions and has potential to maximize functional recovery during gait training in those populations.

Indexed as

GaitProprioceptionAdultAnkleFemaleFoot OrthosesHumansMaleNeurologic ExaminationRoboticsSensory ThresholdsSpinal Cord Injuriesgaitproprioceptionrobotized orthosisspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID31883208
PMCPMC6934873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.