Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31883108›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2020

Changes to the gut microbiota induced by losartan contributes to its antihypertensive effects.

Iñaki Robles-Vera, Marta Toral, Néstor de la Visitación, Manuel Sánchez, Manuel Gómez-Guzmán, Raquel Muñoz, Francesca Algieri, Teresa Vezza, Rosario Jiménez, Julio Gálvez and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. [Research progress on the correlation between Akkermansia muciniphila and cardiovascular diseases].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Review
  7. The probioticGut microbes · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Iñaki Robles-VeraDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6002-9241
Marta ToralGene Regulation in Cardiovascular Remodeling and Inflammation Group, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5324-8569
Néstor de la VisitaciónDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7229-9601
Manuel SánchezDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3975-3398
Manuel Gómez-GuzmánDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2452-9286
Raquel MuñozDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Francesca AlgieriDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Teresa VezzaDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Rosario JiménezDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3872-2669
Julio GálvezDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Miguel RomeroDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0578-1099
Juan Miguel RedondoGene Regulation in Cardiovascular Remodeling and Inflammation Group, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5779-9122
Juan DuarteDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9153-5857
Universidad de Granada · ESSpanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research · ES

Funding

Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, Ministerio de Economía y competitividad AGL2015-67995-C3Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, Ministerio de Economía y competitividad AGL2015-67995-C3-3-RComisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, Ministerio de Economía y competitividad SAF2014-55523-RComisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, Ministerio de Economía y competitividad SAF2017-84894-RFondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional FEDERJunta de Andalucía AGR-6826Junta de Andalucía CTS-164Junta de Andalucía P12-CTS-2722Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Instituto de Salud Carlos III CIBER-CVMinisterio de Economia y Competitividad, Instituto de Salud Carlos III CIBER-EHD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeHypertension is associated with gut dysbiosis. Here we have evaluated the effects of the angiotensin receptor antagonist losartan on gut microbiota in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) to assess their contribution to its antihypertensive effects. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Twenty-week-old Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) and SHR were treated with losartan for 5 weeks (SHR-losartan). Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) was performed from donor SHR-losartan group to recipient untreated-SHR. Blood pressure (BP) was measured using tail-cuff plethysmography. Composition of the gut microbiota was assessed by amplification of the V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA gene. T cells were analysed in gut/aorta by flow cytometry. KEY

resultsFaeces from SHR showed gut dysbiosis, characterised by higher Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratios, lower acetate- and higher lactate-producing bacteria, and lower levels of strict anaerobic bacteria, effects which were restored to normal by losartan. Improvement of gut dysbiosis was linked to higher colonic integrity and lower sympathetic drive in the gut. In contrast, hydralazine reduced BP, but it neither restored gut dysbiosis nor colonic integrity. FMT from SHR-losartan to SHR reduced BP, improved the aortic endothelium-dependent relaxation to ACh, and reduced NADPH oxidase activity. These vascular changes were accompanied by both increased Treg and decreased Th17 cell populations in the vascular wall. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: In SHR, losartan treatment reduced gut dysbiosis and sympathetic drive in the gut, thus improving gut integrity. The changes induced by losartan in gut microbiota contributed, in part, to protecting the vasculature and reducing BP, possibly by modulating the immune system in the gut.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeHypertensionAnimalsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureLosartanRatsRats, Inbred SHRRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAntihypertensive AgentsLosartanRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31883108
PMCPMC7161554
OpenAlexW2998192472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.