Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31883001›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2020

Occupational Exposure and Carriage of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes (tetW, ermB) in Pig Slaughterhouse Workers.

Liese Van Gompel, Wietske Dohmen, Roosmarijn E C Luiken, Martijn Bouwknegt, Lourens Heres, Eri van Heijnsbergen, Betty G M Jongerius-Gortemaker, Peter Scherpenisse, Gerdit D Greve, Monique H G Tersteeg-Zijderveld and 13 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Applying and adapting the welfare qualityJournal of animal science and technology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. International Travel as a Risk Factor for Carriage of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-ProducingInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Liese Van GompelInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wietske DohmenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roosmarijn E C LuikenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martijn BouwknegtVion Food Group, Boseind, Boxtel, The Netherlands.
Lourens HeresVion Food Group, Boseind, Boxtel, The Netherlands.
Eri van HeijnsbergenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Betty G M Jongerius-GortemakerInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter ScherpenisseInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gerdit D GreveInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Monique H G Tersteeg-ZijderveldInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Katharina WadepohlField Station for Epidemiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Foundation, Bakum, Germany.
Ana Sofia Ribeiro DuarteSection for Genomic Epidemiology, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Violeta Muñoz-GómezSAFOSO, Liebefeld, Switzerland.
Jennie FischerGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Straße, Berlin, Germany.
Magdalena SkarżyńskaNational Veterinary Research Institute (PIWet), Puławy, Poland.
Dariusz WasylNational Veterinary Research Institute (PIWet), Puławy, Poland.
Jaap A WagenaarWageningen, Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Bert A P UrlingsVion Food Group, Boseind, Boxtel, The Netherlands.
Alejandro Dorado-GarcíaInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Inge M WoutersInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dick J J HeederikInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Heike SchmittInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lidwien A M SmitInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLVion Food Group (Netherlands) · NLNational Veterinary Research Institute · PLFederal Institute for Risk Assessment · DESafoso (Switzerland) · CHTechnical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSlaughterhouse staff is occupationally exposed to antimicrobial resistant bacteria. Studies reported high antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG) abundances in slaughter pigs. This cross-sectional study investigated occupational exposure to tetracycline (tetW) and macrolide (ermB) resistance genes and assessed determinants for faecal tetW and ermB carriage among pig slaughterhouse workers.

methodsDuring 2015-2016, 483 faecal samples and personal questionnaires were collected from workers in a Dutch pig abattoir, together with 60 pig faecal samples. Human dermal and respiratory exposure was assessed by examining 198 carcass, 326 gloves, and 33 air samples along the line, next to 198 packed pork chops to indicate potential consumer exposure. Samples were analyzed by qPCR (tetW, ermB). A job exposure matrix was created by calculating the percentage of tetW and ermB positive carcasses or gloves for each job position. Multiple linear regression models were used to link exposure to tetW and ermB carriage.

resultsWorkers are exposed to tetracycline and macrolide resistance genes along the slaughter line. Tetw and ermB gradients were found for carcasses, gloves, and air filters. One packed pork chop contained tetW, ermB was non-detectable. Human faecal tetW and ermB concentrations were lower than in pig faeces. Associations were found between occupational tetW exposure and human faecal tetW carriage, yet, not after model adjustments. Sampling round, nationality, and smoking were determinants for ARG carriage.

conclusionWe demonstrated clear environmental tetracycline and macrolide resistance gene exposure gradients along the slaughter line. No robust link was found between ARG exposure and human faecal ARG carriage.

Indexed as

AbattoirsOccupational ExposureAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialMacrolidesSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsMacrolidesairdermal exposurefaecal carriageglovesmacrolide resistancerespiratory exposureretail meattetracycline resistance

Identifiers

PMID31883001
PMCPMC9194797
OpenAlexW2997200343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.