Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31882962›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

A microfluidics-based wound-healing assay for studying the effects of shear stresses, wound widths, and chemicals on the wound-healing process.

Jin-Young Lin, Kai-Yin Lo, Yung-Shin Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Skin-on-chip: Quo vadis?APL bioengineering · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. COMethods and protocols · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Response of cells and tissues to shear stress.Journal of cell science · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jin-Young LinDepartment of Physics, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, 24205, Taiwan.
Kai-Yin LoDepartment of Agricultural Chemistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan.
Yung-Shin SunDepartment of Physics, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, 24205, Taiwan. 089957@mail.fju.edu.tw.
Fu Jen Catholic University · TWNational Taiwan University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collective cell migration plays important roles in various physiological processes. To investigate this collective cellular movement, various wound-healing assays have been developed. In these assays, a "wound" is created mechanically, chemically, optically, or electrically out of a cellular monolayer. Most of these assays are subject to drawbacks of run-to-run variations in wound size/shape and damages to cells/substrate. Moreover, in all these assays, cells are cultured in open, static (non-circulating) environments. In this study, we reported a microfluidics-based wound-healing assay by using the trypsin flow-focusing technique. Fibroblasts were first cultured inside this chip to a cellular monolayer. Then three parallel fluidic flows (containing normal medium and trypsin solution) were introduced into the channels, and cells exposed to protease trypsin were enzymatically detached from the surface. Wounds of three different widths were generated, and subsequent wound-healing processes were observed. This assay is capable of creating three or more wounds of different widths for investigating the effects of various physical and chemical stimuli on wound-healing speeds. The effects of shear stresses, wound widths, and β-lapachone (a wound healing-promoting chemical) on wound-healing speeds were studied. It was found that the wound-healing speed (total area healed per unit time) increased with increasing shear stress and wound width, but under a shear stress of 0.174 mPa the linear healing speed (percent area healed per unit time) was independent of the wound width. Also, the addition of β-lapachone up to 0.5 μM did not accelerate wound healing. This microfluidics-based assay can definitely help in understanding the mechanisms of the wound-healing process and developing new wound-healing therapies.

Indexed as

MicrofluidicsStress, MechanicalWound HealingAnimalsCells, CulturedHumans

Identifiers

PMID31882962
PMCPMC6934480
OpenAlexW2998317142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.