ArticleScientific reports2019
MicroRNAs and their targeted genes associated with phase changes of stem explants during tissue culture of tea plant.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential Alteration of Gene Expression by Benzyl Adenine andPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Transcriptome analysis revealed enrichment pathways and regulation of gene expression associated with somatic embryogenesis in Camellia sinensis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Regulatory roles of noncoding RNAs in callus induction and plant cell dedifferentiation.Plant cell reports · 2023Review
- MiRNA fine tuning for crop improvement: using advance computational models and biotechnological tools.Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
- Regulatory non-coding RNAs: Emerging roles during plant cell reprogramming andFrontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- miRNA expression profiling and zeatin dynamic changes in a new model system of in vivo indirect regeneration of tomato.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elucidation of the molecular mechanism related to the dedifferentiation and redifferentiation during tissue culture will be useful for optimizing regeneration system of tea plant. In this study, an integrated sRNAome and transcriptome analyses were carried out during phase changes of the stem explant culture. Among 198 miRNAs and 8001 predicted target genes, 178 differentially expressed miRNAs and 4264 potential targets were screened out from explants, primary calli, as well as regenerated roots and shoots. According to KEGG analysis of the potential targets, pathway of "aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis", "proteasome" and "glutathione metabolism" was of great significance during the dedifferentiation, and pathway of "porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism", "mRNA surveillance pathway", "nucleotide excision repair" was indispensable for redifferentiation of the calli. Expression pattern of 12 miRNAs, including csn-micR390e, csn-miR156b-5p, csn-miR157d-5p, csn-miR156, csn-miR166a-3p, csn-miR166e, csn-miR167d, csn-miR393c-3p, csn-miR394, csn-miR396a-3p, csn-miR396 and csn-miR396e-3p, was validated by qRT-PCR among 57 differentially expressed phase-specific miRNAs. Validation also confirmed that regulatory module of csn-miR167d/ERF3, csn-miR156/SPB1, csn-miR166a-3p/ATHB15, csn-miR396/AIP15A, csn-miR157d-5p/GST and csn-miR393c-3p/ATG18b might play important roles in regulating the phase changes during tissue culture of stem explants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.