Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31882859›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection.

Sandeep Madireddy, Ding-Wen Chung, Troy Loeffler, Subramanian K R S Sankaranarayanan, David N Seidman, Prasanna Balaprakash, Olle Heinonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Atom probe tomography.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sandeep MadireddyMathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 60439, United States.
Ding-Wen ChungDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, United States.
Troy LoefflerNanoscience and Technology Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 60439, United States.
Subramanian K R S SankaranarayananNanoscience and Technology Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 60439, United States.
David N SeidmanDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, United States.
Prasanna BalaprakashMathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 60439, United States.
Olle HeinonenMaterials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 60439, United States. heinonen@anl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3618-6092

Funding

United States Department of Commerce | National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 70NANB14H012U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-AC02-06CH11357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atom-probe tomography (APT) facilitates nano- and atomic-scale characterization and analysis of microstructural features. Specifically, APT is well suited to study the interfacial properties of granular or heterophase systems. Traditionally, the identification of the interface between, for precipitate and matrix phases, in APT data has been obtained either by extracting iso-concentration surfaces based on a user-supplied concentration value or by manually perturbing the concentration value until the iso-concentration surface qualitatively matches the interface. These approaches are subjective, not scalable, and may lead to inconsistencies due to local composition inhomogeneities. We introduce a digital image segmentation approach based on deep neural networks that transfer learned knowledge from natural images to automatically segment the data obtained from APT into different phases. This approach not only provides an efficient way to segment the data and extract interfacial properties but does so without the need for expensive interface labeling for training the segmentation model. We consider here a system with a precipitate phase in a matrix and with three different interface modalities-layered, isolated, and interconnected-that are obtained for different relative geometries of the precipitate phase. We demonstrate the accuracy of our segmentation approach through qualitative visualization of the interfaces, as well as through quantitative comparisons with proximity histograms obtained by using more traditional approaches.

Identifiers

PMID31882859
PMCPMC6934719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.