Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31882784›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Intermittent treatment interruption and its effect on multidrug resistant tuberculosis treatment outcome in Ethiopia.

Habteyes H Tola, Kourosh Holakouie-Naieni, Mohammad A Mansournia, Mehdi Yaseri, Ephrem Tesfaye, Zemedu Mahamed, Million Molla Sisay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Financial impact of COVID-19 on TB patients in India.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Habteyes H TolaTehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2889-956X
Kourosh Holakouie-NaieniTehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran, Iran. holakoik@hotmail.com.
Mohammad A MansourniaTehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi YaseriTehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran, Iran.
Ephrem TesfayeEthiopian Public Health Institute, Tuberculosis/HIV Research Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Zemedu MahamedEthiopian Public Health Institute, Tuberculosis/HIV Research Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Million Molla SisaySaint Peter's Specialized Hospital, Research and Evidence Generation Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment interruption is one of the main risk factors of poor treatment outcome and occurrence of additional drug resistant tuberculosis. This study is a national retrospective cohort study with 10 years follow up period in MDR-TB patients in Ethiopia. We included 204 patients who had missed the treatment at least for one day over the course of the treatment (exposed group) and 203 patients who had never interrupted the treatment (unexposed group). We categorized treatment outcome into successful (cured or completed) and unsuccessful (lost to follow up, failed or died). We described treatment interruption by the length of time between interruptions, time to first interruption, total number of interruption episodes and percent of missed doses. We used Poisson regression model with robust standard error to determine the association between treatment interruption and outcome. 82% of the patients interrupted the treatment in the first six month of treatment period, and considerable proportion of patients demonstrated long intervals between two consecutive interruptions. Treatment interruption was significantly associated with unsuccessful treatment outcome (Adjusted Risk Ratio (ARR) = 1.9; 95% CI (1.4-2.6)). Early identification of patients at high risk of interruption is vital in improving successful treatment outcome.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntitubercular AgentsEthiopiaFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantYoung AdultAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID31882784
PMCPMC6934462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.