Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31882743›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Quantifying free behaviour in an open field using k-motif approach.

Marein Könings, Mark Blokpoel, Katarzyna Kapusta, Tom Claassen, Jan K Buitelaar, Jeffrey C Glennon, Natalia Z Bielczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. High mirror symmetry in mouse exploratory behavior.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marein KöningsRadboud University Nijmegen, Comeniuslaan 4, 6525 HP, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mark BlokpoelRadboud University Nijmegen, Comeniuslaan 4, 6525 HP, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1522-0343
Katarzyna KapustaDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Groteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tom ClaassenRadboud University Nijmegen, Comeniuslaan 4, 6525 HP, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan K BuitelaarDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Groteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8288-7757
Jeffrey C GlennonDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Groteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Natalia Z BielczykDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Groteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. natalia.bielczyk@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1604-9143

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantification and parametrisation of movement are widely used in animal behavioural paradigms. In particular, free movement in controlled conditions (e.g., open field paradigm) is used as a "proxy for indices of baseline and drug-induced behavioural changes. However, the analysis of this is often time- and labour-intensive and existing algorithms do not always classify the behaviour correctly. Here, we propose a new approach to quantify behaviour in an unconstrained environment: searching for frequent patterns (k-motifs) in the time series representing the position of the subject over time. Validation of this method was performed using subchronic quinpirole-induced changes in open field experiment behaviours in rodents. Analysis of this data was performed using k-motifs as features to better classify subjects into experimental groups on the basis of behaviour in the open field. Our classifier using k-motifs gives as high as 94% accuracy in classifying repetitive behaviour versus controls which is a substantial improvement compared to currently available methods including using standard feature definitions (depending on the choice of feature set and classification strategy, accuracy up to 88%). Furthermore, visualisation of the movement/time patterns is highly predictive of these behaviours. By using machine learning, this can be applied to behavioural analysis across experimental paradigms.

Identifiers

PMID31882743
PMCPMC6934846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.