Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31882651›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Reversibility of membrane permeabilization upon pulsed electric field treatment in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1.

E M J Vaessen, R A H Timmermans, M H Tempelaars, M A I Schutyser, H M W den Besten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. A novel cell permeability assay for macromolecules.BMC molecular and cell biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E M J VaessenFood Process Engineering, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
R A H TimmermansWageningen Food and Biobased Research, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
M H TempelaarsFood Microbiology, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
M A I SchutyserFood Process Engineering, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
H M W den BestenFood Microbiology, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands. heidy.denbesten@wur.nl.
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment, or electroporation, can be used to load molecules into cells. The permeabilizing effect of the PEF treatment on the cellular membrane can be either reversible or irreversible depending on the severity of the PEF treatment conditions. The influence of PEF on the reversibility of membrane permeabilization in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 by two different fluorescent staining methods was investigated in this study. Whereas staining with propidium iodide (PI) before and after PEF treatment indicated small reversible permeabilized fractions of maximum 14%, the use of a double staining method with PI and SYTOX Green suggested larger reversible permeabilized fractions up to 40% of the population. This difference shows that the choice for a fluorescent staining method affects the conclusions drawn regarding reversibility of membrane permeabilization. Additionally, the effect of PEF treatment conditions on membrane integrity was compared, indicating a relation between critical electric field strength, cell size and membrane permeabilization. Overall this study showed the possibilities and limitations of fluorescent membrane integrity staining methods for PEF studies.

Indexed as

Biophysical PhenomenaCell Membrane PermeabilityElectroporationBiomarkersCell MembraneCell SurvivalFlow CytometryLactiplantibacillus plantarumBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31882651
PMCPMC6934533
OpenAlexW2998564107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.