Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31882601›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

A generic workflow for Single Locus Sequence Typing (SLST) design and subspecies characterization of microbiota.

Thomas H A Ederveen, Jos P H Smits, Karima Hajo, Saskia van Schalkwijk, Tessa A Kouwenhoven, Sabina Lukovac, Michiel Wels, Ellen H van den Bogaard, Joost Schalkwijk, Jos Boekhorst and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Model-Based Meta-Analysis to OptimizeJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2022
    Article
  7. Interspecies Regulation BetweenFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas H A EderveenCenter for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics (CMBI), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Tom.Ederveen@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0068-1275
Jos P H SmitsDepartment of Dermatology, RIMLS, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0915-8624
Karima HajoCenter for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics (CMBI), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Saskia van SchalkwijkNIZO, Ede, The Netherlands.
Tessa A KouwenhovenDepartment of Dermatology, RIMLS, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sabina LukovacNIZO, Ede, The Netherlands.
Michiel WelsCenter for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics (CMBI), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ellen H van den BogaardDepartment of Dermatology, RIMLS, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joost SchalkwijkDepartment of Dermatology, RIMLS, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jos BoekhorstCenter for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics (CMBI), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Patrick L J M ZeeuwenDepartment of Dermatology, RIMLS, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sacha A F T van HijumCenter for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics (CMBI), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLNederlands Instituut Voor Zuivel Oonderzoek · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present TaxPhlAn, a new method and bioinformatics pipeline for design and analysis of single-locus sequence typing (SLST) markers to type and profile bacteria beyond the species-level in a complex microbial community background. TaxPhlAn can be applied to any group of phylogenetically-related bacteria, provided reference genomes are available. As TaxPhlAn requires the SLST targets identified to fit the phylogenetic pattern as determined through comprehensive evolutionary reconstruction of input genomes, TaxPhlAn allows for the identification and phylogenetic inference of new biodiversity. Here, we present a clinically relevant case study of high-resolution Staphylococcus profiling on skin of atopic dermatitis (AD) patients. We demonstrate that SLST enables profiling of cutaneous Staphylococcus members at (sub)species level and provides higher resolution than current 16S-based techniques. With the higher discriminative ability provided by our approach, we further show that the presence of Staphylococcus capitis on the skin together with Staphylococcus aureus associates with AD disease.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial Typing TechniquesComputational BiologyDermatitis, AtopicFemaleGenes, BacterialHumansMaleMicrobiotaPhylogenySkinSpecies SpecificityStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcusWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID31882601
PMCPMC6934516
OpenAlexW2997886319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.