Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31882453›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Neurons differentiate magnitude and location of mechanical stimuli.

Benjamin M Gaub, Krishna Chaitanya Kasuba, Emilie Mace, Tobias Strittmatter, Pawel R Laskowski, Sydney A Geissler, Andreas Hierlemann, Martin Fussenegger, Botond Roska, Daniel J Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Benjamin M GaubDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland; benjamin.gaub@bsse.ethz.ch daniel.mueller@bsse.ethz.ch.
Krishna Chaitanya KasubaDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Emilie MaceNeural Circuit Laboratories, Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Tobias StrittmatterDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Pawel R LaskowskiDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Sydney A GeisslerDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Andreas HierlemannDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Martin FusseneggerDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Botond RoskaNeural Circuit Laboratories, Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel J MüllerDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland; benjamin.gaub@bsse.ethz.ch daniel.mueller@bsse.ethz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal activity can be modulated by mechanical stimuli. To study this phenomenon quantitatively, we mechanically stimulated rat cortical neurons by shear stress and local indentation. Neurons show 2 distinct responses, classified as transient and sustained. Transient responses display fast kinetics, similar to spontaneous neuronal activity, whereas sustained responses last several minutes before returning to baseline. Local soma stimulations with micrometer-sized beads evoke transient responses at low forces of ∼220 nN and pressures of ∼5.6 kPa and sustained responses at higher forces of ∼360 nN and pressures of ∼9.2 kPa. Among the neuronal compartments, axons are highly susceptible to mechanical stimulation and predominantly show sustained responses, whereas the less susceptible dendrites predominantly respond transiently. Chemical perturbation experiments suggest that mechanically evoked responses require the influx of extracellular calcium through ion channels. We propose that subtraumatic forces/pressures applied to neurons evoke neuronal responses via nonspecific gating of ion channels.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsBiophysicsCalciumCell MembraneCells, CulturedCytoskeletonIon ChannelsMechanotransduction, CellularNeuronsPhysical StimulationPressureRatsCalciumIon Channelsatomic force microscopycalcium responsecortex neuronsmechanobiologymechanosensitivity

Identifiers

PMID31882453
PMCPMC6969492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.