Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31882448›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Revisiting the tumorigenesis timeline with a data-driven generative model.

Kamel Lahouel, Laurent Younes, Ludmila Danilova, Francis M Giardiello, Ralph H Hruban, John Groopman, Kenneth W Kinzler, Bert Vogelstein, Donald Geman, Cristian Tomasetti

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kamel LahouelDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Laurent YounesDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.ORCID 0000-0003-2017-9565
Ludmila DanilovaDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Francis M GiardielloDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287.
Ralph H HrubanThe Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231.
John GroopmanDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21231.
Kenneth W KinzlerThe Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD 21287.
Bert VogelsteinThe Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD 21287.
Donald GemanDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218; geman@jhu.edu ctomasetti@jhu.edu.
Cristian TomasettiDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; geman@jhu.edu ctomasetti@jhu.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Tumor Antigens for Individual Signatures and TherapyP50CA062924 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LENNON, ANNE MARIE · 1993 to 2022
$54.6M
MOLECULAR GENETIC ANALYSIS OF COLORECTAL CANCERR37CA043460 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VOGELSTEIN, BERT · 1997 to 2016
$7.4M
Hardwiring Mechanism into Predicting Cancer Phenotypes by Computational LearningR01CA200859 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MARCHIONNI, LUIGI · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
(PQB6) Genetics of Subclonal Evolution in Pancreatic CancerR01CA179991 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI IACOBUZIO-DONAHUE, CHRISTINE A · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
GENES FROM THE FAP LOCUSR01CA057345 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KINZLER, KENNETH W. · 1992 to 2001
$734k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS P50 CA062924NCI NIH HHS R01 CA057345NCI NIH HHS R01 CA179991NCI NIH HHS R01 CA200859NCI NIH HHS R37 CA043460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is driven by the sequential accumulation of genetic and epigenetic changes in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. The timing of these events is not well understood. Moreover, it is currently unknown why the same driver gene change appears as an early event in some cancer types and as a later event, or not at all, in others. These questions have become even more topical with the recent progress brought by genome-wide sequencing studies of cancer. Focusing on mutational events, we provide a mathematical model of the full process of tumor evolution that includes different types of fitness advantages for driver genes and carrying-capacity considerations. The model is able to recapitulate a substantial proportion of the observed cancer incidence in several cancer types (colorectal, pancreatic, and leukemia) and inherited conditions (Lynch and familial adenomatous polyposis), by changing only 2 tissue-specific parameters: the number of stem cells in a tissue and its cell division frequency. The model sheds light on the evolutionary dynamics of cancer by suggesting a generalized early onset of tumorigenesis followed by slow mutational waves, in contrast to previous conclusions. Formulas and estimates are provided for the fitness increases induced by driver mutations, often much larger than previously described, and highly tissue dependent. Our results suggest a mechanistic explanation for why the selective fitness advantage introduced by specific driver genes is tissue dependent.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAdenomatous Polyposis ColiAgedCarcinogenesisCell DivisionColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisHumansMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasmsOncogenescancerdriver genesfitnessmutationstumorigenesis

Identifiers

PMID31882448
PMCPMC6969520
OpenAlexW2998671225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.