Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31882281›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2020

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Noninvasive Assessment of Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Preliminary Findings from the PURE-01 Study.

Andrea Necchi, Marco Bandini, Giuseppina Calareso, Daniele Raggi, Filippo Pederzoli, Elena Farè, Maurizio Colecchia, Laura Marandino, Marco Bianchi, Andrea Gallina and 16 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. What's next for VI-RADS? Updates and future perspectives from the ACR VI-RADS steering committee.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. End Points for the Next-Generation Bladder-Sparing Perioperative Trials for Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. [Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea NecchiFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy. Electronic address: andrea.necchi@istitutotumori.mi.it.
Marco BandiniUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppina CalaresoFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Daniele RaggiFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Filippo PederzoliUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Elena FarèFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Maurizio ColecchiaFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Laura MarandinoFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Marco BianchiUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Andrea GallinaUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Renzo ColomboUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Nicola FossatiUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio GandagliaUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Umberto CapitanioUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Federico DehòUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Patrizia GiannatempoFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Roberta LucianòUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Andrea SaloniaUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Russell MadisonFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Siraj M AliFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jon H ChungFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jeffrey S RossFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Alberto BrigantiUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Francesco MontorsiUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Francesco De CobelliVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Clinical and Experimental Radiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy.
Antonella MessinaFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITFoundation Medicine (United States)Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITSUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the PURE-01 study, pembrolizumab was given preoperatively before radical cystectomy in clinical T2-4aN0M0 patients. An accurate clinical response assessment may be useful for developing new perioperative strategies in these patients.

objectiveTo evaluate the association between bladder multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) findings after pembrolizumab and the pathological complete response (CR; pT0). DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsPatients were staged using bladder mpMRI whereby radiologists were asked to characterize the following parameters: residual disease at T1- and T2-weighted images (step 1: yes/no), presence of hyperintense spots within the bladder wall on diffusion-weighted imaging (step 2: yes/no), and presence of pathological contrast enhancement (step 3: yes/no), before and after three cycles of pembrolizumab. Examinations were internally assessed by two senior radiologists and externally evaluated by a third senior radiologist.

interventionTo evaluate bladder tumor response after neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, mpMRI was used. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary objective was to predict the pT0 after neoadjuvant pembrolizumab by relying on the mpMRI findings. Cohen's kappa statistics was used to assess interobserver variability. Univariable analyses for pT0 were performed including internal and external post-therapy mpMRI steps. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: From February 2017 to October 2018, 82 patients (164 total mpMRI assessments) were analyzed. The agreement between the internal and external mpMRI assessments after therapy was acceptable (κ values ranging from 0.5 to 0.76). Each mpMRI step was significantly associated with pT0 in both internal and external assessments. In patients with CR/no evidence of residual disease (NED) in all internally evaluated mpMRI steps (N = 37), the pT0 was seen in 23 (62%), compared with 19 of 26 externally evaluated NED patients (73%).

conclusionsIn post-pembrolizumab muscle-invasive bladder cancer, mpMRI sequence assessment had acceptable interobserver variability and represented the basis for the proposal of a radiological CR/NED status definition predicting the pT0 response to pembrolizumab. After validation of these findings with external datasets, we propose this tool for developing bladder-sparing immunotherapy maintenance therapies. PATIENT SUMMARY: Assessment of the extent of disease in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer using conventional imaging yields serious limitations. In the PURE-01 study, we evaluated the potential of bladder multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict the pathological complete response to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab. After validation with larger datasets, the proposed stepwise assessment incorporating multiparametric MRI sequences will be used at our center to develop bladder-sparing approaches in future studies.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalpembrolizumabBladder magnetic resonance imagingMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingMuscle-invasive bladder cancerNeoadjuvant therapyPembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID31882281
OpenAlexW2996950697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.