Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31882008›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2019

Increased gait variability during robot-assisted walking is accompanied by increased sensorimotor brain activity in healthy people.

Alisa Berger, Fabian Horst, Fabian Steinberg, Fabian Thomas, Claudia Müller-Eising, Wolfgang I Schöllhorn, Michael Doppelmayr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Effect and optimal exercise prescription of robot-assisted gait training on lower extremity motor function in stroke patients: a network meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Applications of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Neuroimaging During Rehabilitation Following Stroke: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Functional magnetic resonance brain imaging of imagined walking to study locomotor function after stroke.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alisa BergerDepartment of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Albert Schweitzer Straße 22, 55128, Mainz, Germany. alisa.berger@uni-mainz.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2888-7064
Fabian HorstDepartment of Training and Movement Science, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Fabian SteinbergDepartment of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Albert Schweitzer Straße 22, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Fabian ThomasDepartment of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Albert Schweitzer Straße 22, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Claudia Müller-EisingCenter of Neurorehabilitation neuroneum, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Wolfgang I SchöllhornDepartment of Training and Movement Science, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Michael DoppelmayrDepartment of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Albert Schweitzer Straße 22, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DELouisiana State University · USUniversity of Salzburg · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGait disorders are major symptoms of neurological diseases affecting the quality of life. Interventions that restore walking and allow patients to maintain safe and independent mobility are essential. Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) proved to be a promising treatment for restoring and improving the ability to walk. Due to heterogenuous study designs and fragmentary knowlegde about the neural correlates associated with RAGT and the relation to motor recovery, guidelines for an individually optimized therapy can hardly be derived. To optimize robotic rehabilitation, it is crucial to understand how robotic assistance affect locomotor control and its underlying brain activity. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the effects of robotic assistance (RA) during treadmill walking (TW) on cortical activity and the relationship between RA-related changes of cortical activity and biomechanical gait characteristics.

methodsTwelve healthy, right-handed volunteers (9 females; M = 25 ± 4 years) performed unassisted walking (UAW) and robot-assisted walking (RAW) trials on a treadmill, at 2.8 km/h, in a randomized, within-subject design. Ground reaction forces (GRFs) provided information regarding the individual gait patterns, while brain activity was examined by measuring cerebral hemodynamic changes in brain regions associated with the cortical locomotor network, including the sensorimotor cortex (SMC), premotor cortex (PMC) and supplementary motor area (SMA), using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

resultsA statistically significant increase in brain activity was observed in the SMC compared with the PMC and SMA (p < 0.05), and a classical double bump in the vertical GRF was observed during both UAW and RAW throughout the stance phase. However, intraindividual gait variability increased significantly with RA and was correlated with increased brain activity in the SMC (p = 0.05; r = 0.57).

conclusionsOn the one hand, robotic guidance could generate sensory feedback that promotes active participation, leading to increased gait variability and somatosensory brain activity. On the other hand, changes in brain activity and biomechanical gait characteristics may also be due to the sensory feedback of the robot, which disrupts the cortical network of automated walking in healthy individuals. More comprehensive neurophysiological studies both in laboratory and in clinical settings are necessary to investigate the entire brain network associated with RAW.

Indexed as

RoboticsSelf-Help DevicesAdultBrainBrain MappingExercise TherapyFemaleGaitGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMaleWalkingBrain activityfNIRSFunctional near-infrared spectroscopyGait variabilityGRFNeuroimagingNeurorehabilitationRAGTRobotic rehabilitationWalking

Identifiers

PMID31882008
PMCPMC6935063
OpenAlexW2997019386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.