Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31881982›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

SpliceFinder: ab initio prediction of splice sites using convolutional neural network.

Ruohan Wang, Zishuai Wang, Jianping Wang, Shuaicheng Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Caduceus: Bi-Directional Equivariant Long-Range DNA Sequence Modeling.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Applications for Deep Learning in Epilepsy Genetic Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ruohan WangDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Ave, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
Zishuai WangDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Ave, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
Jianping WangDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Ave, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China. jianwang@cityu.edu.hk.
Shuaicheng LiDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Ave, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China. shuaicli@cityu.edu.hk.
City University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying splice sites is a necessary step to analyze the location and structure of genes. Two dinucleotides, GT and AG, are highly frequent on splice sites, and many other patterns are also on splice sites with important biological functions. Meanwhile, the dinucleotides occur frequently at the sequences without splice sites, which makes the prediction prone to generate false positives. Most existing tools select all the sequences with the two dimers and then focus on distinguishing the true splice sites from those pseudo ones. Such an approach will lead to a decrease in false positives; however, it will result in non-canonical splice sites missing.

resultWe have designed SpliceFinder based on convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict splice sites. To achieve the ab initio prediction, we used human genomic data to train our neural network. An iterative approach is adopted to reconstruct the dataset, which tackles the data unbalance problem and forces the model to learn more features of splice sites. The proposed CNN obtains the classification accuracy of 90.25%, which is 10% higher than the existing algorithms. The method outperforms other existing methods in terms of area under receiver operating characteristics (AUC), recall, precision, and F1 score. Furthermore, SpliceFinder can find the exact position of splice sites on long genomic sequences with a sliding window. Compared with other state-of-the-art splice site prediction tools, SpliceFinder generates results in about half lower false positive while keeping recall higher than 0.8. Also, SpliceFinder captures the non-canonical splice sites. In addition, SpliceFinder performs well on the genomic sequences of Drosophila melanogaster, Mus musculus, Rattus, and Danio rerio without retraining.

conclusionBased on CNN, we have proposed a new ab initio splice site prediction tool, SpliceFinder, which generates less false positives and can detect non-canonical splice sites. Additionally, SpliceFinder is transferable to other species without retraining. The source code and additional materials are available at https://gitlab.deepomics.org/wangruohan/SpliceFinder.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsBase SequenceComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGenomeHumansRNA Splice SitesRNA SplicingRNA Splice SitesCanonical and non-canonical splice sitesConvolutional neural networkSplice site prediction

Identifiers

PMID31881982
PMCPMC6933889
OpenAlexW2996771978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.