Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31881950›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Psychological intimate partner violence against women in the European Union: a cross-national invariance study.

Manuel Martín-Fernández, Enrique Gracia, Marisol Lila

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manuel Martín-FernándezDepartment of Social Psychology, University of Valencia, Avda. Blasco Ibañez 21, 46010, Valencia, Spain. manuel.martin@uv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3606-3559
Enrique GraciaDepartment of Social Psychology, University of Valencia, Avda. Blasco Ibañez 21, 46010, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0514-2983
Marisol LilaDepartment of Social Psychology, University of Valencia, Avda. Blasco Ibañez 21, 46010, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0522-7461
Universitat de València · ES

Funding

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad BES-2015-075576Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad PSI2017-84764-P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) is a worldwide public health problem. One of the most frequent forms of this type of violence in western societies is psychological IPVAW. According to the European Union (EU) Fundamental Rights Association (FRA) the prevalence of psychological IPVAW in the EU is 43%. However, the measurement invariance of the measure addressing psychological IPVAW in this survey has not yet been assessed.

methodsThe aim of this study is to ensure the cross-national comparability of this measure, by evaluating its measurement invariance across the 28 EU countries in a sample of 37,724 women, and to examine how the levels of this type of violence are distributed across the EU.

resultsOur results showed that the psychological IPVAW measure presented adequate psychometric properties (reliability and validity) in all countries. A latent structure of one factor was supported and scalar invariance was established in all countries. The average levels of psychological IPVAW were higher in countries like Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Sweden compared to the rest of the EU countries. In many of the other countries the levels of this type of violence overlapped.

conclusionOur findings underlined the importance of using appropriate statistical methods to make valid cross-national comparisons in large population surveys.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEuropean UnionFemaleHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceMiddle AgedPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultControlling behaviorCross-national researchEmotional abuseEuropean UnionIntimate partner violenceMeasurement invariancePsychological violenceSurveys

Identifiers

PMID31881950
PMCPMC6935167
OpenAlexW2997654176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.