Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31881928›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection on subsequent cervical cancer screening completion among under-screened US women: MyBodyMyTest-3 protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Lisa P Spees, Andrea C Des Marais, Stephanie B Wheeler, Michael G Hudgens, Sarah Doughty, Noel T Brewer, Jennifer S Smith

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02651883 (Effect of HPV Self-Collection on Cervical Cancer Screening in High Risk Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02651883 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of HPV Self-Collection on Cervical Cancer Screening in High Risk Women: My Body, My Test 3

TypeinterventionalSponsorUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2016 to 2020Enrolled665ConditionsCervical Cancer, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Human PapillomavirusArmsScreening invitation (with education), Self-collection for HPV testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Racial Differences in Expected Versus Actual Costs of Cervical Cancer Screening among Low-Income, Underscreened Women in North Carolina.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cost-effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Self-collection Intervention on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake among Underscreened U.S. Persons with a Cervix.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Lisa P SpeesDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 1102-G McGavran-Greenberg, CB7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA. lspees21@email.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5680-9330
Andrea C Des MaraisDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 2103 McGavran-Greenberg, CB7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7435, USA.
Stephanie B WheelerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 1102-G McGavran-Greenberg, CB7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA.
Michael G HudgensDepartment of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sarah DoughtyDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 2103 McGavran-Greenberg, CB7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7435, USA.
Noel T BrewerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jennifer S SmithLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. jennifers@unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Cancer Care Quality Training ProgramT32CA116339 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ETHAN M. BASCH, Stephanie Brooke Wheeler · 2018 to 2026
$3.0M
Effect of HPV Self-Collection on Cervical Cancer Screening in High Risk WomenR01CA183891 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SMITH, JENNIFER SUSAN · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183891NCI NIH HHS T32 CA116339NCI NIH HHS T32-CA-116339NIH HHS 5R01CA183891-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening substantially reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality. More than half of invasive cervical cancers are attributable to infrequent screening or not screening at all. The current study, My Body My Test (MBMT), evaluates the impact of mailed kits for self-collection of samples for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on completion of cervical cancer screening in low-income, North Carolina women overdue for cervical cancer screening. METHODS/

designThe study will enroll at least 510 US women aged 25-64 years who report no Pap test in the last 4 years and no HPV test in the last 6 years. We will randomize participants to an intervention or control arm. The intervention arm will receive kits to self-collect a sample at home and mail it for HPV testing. In both the intervention and control arms, participants will receive assistance in scheduling an appointment for screening in clinic. Study staff will deliver HPV self-collection results by phone and assist in scheduling participants for screening in clinic. The primary outcome is completion of cervical cancer screening. Specifically, completion of screening will be defined as screening in clinic or receipt of negative HPV self-collection results. Women with HPV-negative self-collection results will be considered screening-complete. All other participants will be considered screening-complete if they obtain co-testing or Pap test screening at a study-affiliated institution or other clinic. We will assess whether the self-collection intervention influences participants' perceived risk of cervical cancer and whether perceived risk mediates the relationship between HPV self-collection results and subsequent screening in clinic. We also will estimate the incremental cost per woman screened of offering at-home HPV self-collection kits with scheduling assistance as compared to offering scheduling assistance alone. DISCUSSION: If mailed self-collection of samples for HPV testing is an effective strategy for increasing cervical cancer screening among women overdue for screening, this method has the potential to reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality in medically underserved women at higher risk of developing cervical cancer.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02651883, Registered on 11 January 2016.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPovertyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReagent Kits, DiagnosticResearch DesignSelf-ExaminationReagent Kits, DiagnosticCancer screeningCervical cancerHealth disparitiesHuman papillomavirusUnder-screened populations

Identifiers

PMID31881928
PMCPMC6935089
OpenAlexW2998009548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.