ReviewBMC health services research2019
Creating performance intelligence for primary health care strengthening in Europe.
Review in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Performance measurement systems in primary health care: a systematic literature review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Approaches to Measure Efficiency in Primary Care: A Systematic Literature Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2022Pooled it
- Application of an Intelligent Continuous Care Model During Skin Expansion in Auricular Reconstruction.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Trial
- A study on the efficiency and spatial correlation of health resource allocation in Chinese hospitals.PloS one · 2026Article
- The Seattle Angina Questionnaire and Quality of Life in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Opportunities for Implementation in Bulgarian Clinical Practice-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Measuring the strength of primary care: development of a new system of Structural Indicators for the Strength of Primary Care - SiSPC.Primary health care research & development · 2025Article
- Construction and Evaluation of the Bidirectional Referral System in Internet Hospital: Case Study of Children's Hospital in Western China.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- A Multi-dimensional Framework of Valued Output for Primary Care in England.Applied health economics and health policy · 2024Review
- Does vertical integration increase the costs for primary care inpatients? Evidence from a national pilot programme in China.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024Article
- Exploring the accessibility of primary health care data in Europe's COVID-19 response: developing key indicators for managing future pandemics (Eurodata study).BMC primary care · 2024Article
- A scoping review of continuous quality improvement in healthcare system: conceptualization, models and tools, barriers and facilitators, and impact.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Evaluating China's primary healthcare services' efficiency and spatial correlation: a three-stage DEA-Malmquist model.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Identifying key policy objectives for strong primary care: a cross-sectional study.Primary health care research & development · 2023Article
- Associations Among Organizational Capabilities, Organizational Performance and the Medical Alliance Implementation Effect in Community Health Centers in China: A Moderated Mediation Model.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
- Patient experience in community health services and first choice for medical attention: A cross-sectional study in Wuhan, China.PloS one · 2023Article
- Performance indicators of Primary Care of the Previne Brasil Program.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2023Observational
- Status of the health information system in Ireland and its fitness to support health system performance assessment: a multimethod assessment based on stakeholder involvement.Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- Article
- Should indicators be correlated? Formative indicators for healthcare quality measurement.BMJ open quality · 2022Article
- Primary health care and social isolation against COVID-19 in Northeastern Brazil: Ecological time-series study.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrimary health care and its strengthening through performance measurement is essential for sustainably working towards universal health coverage. Existing performance frameworks and indicators to measure primary health care capture system functions like governance, financing and resourcing but to a lesser extent the function of services delivery and its heterogeneous nature. Moreover, most frameworks have weak links with routine information systems and national health priorities, especially in the context of high- and middle-income countries. This paper presents the development of a tool that responds to this context with the aim to create primary health care performance intelligence for the 53 countries of the WHO European Region.
methodsThe work builds-off of an existing systematic review on primary care and draws on priorities of current European health policies and available (inter)national information systems. Its development included: (i) reviewing and classifying features of primary care; (ii) constructing a set of tracer conditions; and (iii) mapping existing indicators in the framework resulting from (i). The analysis was validated through a series of reviews: in-person meetings with country-nominated focal points and primary care experts; at-distance expert reviews; and, preliminary testing with country informants.
resultsThe resulting framework applies a performance continuum in the classical approach of structures-processes-outcomes spanning 6 domains - primary care structures, model of primary care, care contact, primary care outputs, health system outcomes, and health outcomes - that are further classified by 26 subdomains and 63 features of primary care. A care continuum was developed using a set of 12 tracer conditions. A total of 139 indicators were mapped to the classification, each with an identified data source to safeguard measurability. Individual indicator passports and a glossary of terms were developed to support the standardization of the findings.
conclusionThe resulting framework and suite of indicators, coined the Primary Health Care Impact, Performance and Capacity Tool (PHC-IMPACT), has the potential to be applied in Europe, closing the gap on existing data collection, analysis and use of performance intelligence for decision-making towards primary health care strengthening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.