Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31881877›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2019

The influence of a community intervention on influenza vaccination knowledge and behavior among diabetic patients.

Lili Tao, Ming Lu, Xiaoning Wang, Xiaoyan Han, Shuming Li, Haiyan Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sense of community belonging and influenza vaccine uptake in Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lili TaoDepartment of Chronic Diseases Prevention and Control, Beijing Chaoyang District Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 25 Panjiayuan Huaweili, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Ming LuPeking Union Medical College, Cancer hospital, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Xiaoning WangDepartment of Chronic Diseases Prevention and Control, Beijing Chaoyang District Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 25 Panjiayuan Huaweili, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyan HanDepartment of Chronic Diseases Prevention and Control, Beijing Chaoyang District Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 25 Panjiayuan Huaweili, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Shuming LiDepartment of Chronic Diseases Prevention and Control, Beijing Chaoyang District Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 25 Panjiayuan Huaweili, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Haiyan WangBeijing Friendship Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. why3005@126.com.
Beijing Friendship Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

Pilot project on chronic diseases and immune prevention policy of China Preventive Medicine Association 20170101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was conducted to evaluate the impact of a comprehensive community intervention on cognition and inoculation behaviors of diabetic patients immunized with influenza vaccine.

methodsA total of 1538 diabetic patients aged 35 years and above for outpatient visits and follow-up treatments were selected from six community health service centers (three for the experimental group, and the other three for the control group) in Chaoyang District, Beijing. Comprehensive interventions applied to the experimental group include patient intervention and community climate interventions. We compared the total awareness of influenza vaccine knowledge and influenza vaccination rates between the two groups before and after the intervention.

resultsBefore the intervention, the total awareness rate of influenza vaccine in the experimental group and the control group was similar (50.6 and 50.2%, respectively. P = 0.171). After the intervention, the awareness rate of influenza vaccine in the experimental group and the control group increased. The amplitude of the increase was similar (70.3 and 70.1%, respectively. P = 0.822,). Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in the influenza vaccination rate between the experimental group and the control group (29.0 and 26.8%, respectively. P = 0.334). After the intervention, the vaccination rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group. The difference was statistically significant (The vaccination rate 45.8 and 27.4% for the experimental group and the control group, respectively. P < 0.001).

conclusionComprehensive community interventions had a positive effect on vaccination in diabetic patients.

trial registrationChiCTR1900025194, registered in Aug,16th, 2019. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfluenza VaccinesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBeijingDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationVaccinationInfluenza VaccinesComprehensive community interventionDiabetic patientsInfluenzaVaccination

Identifiers

PMID31881877
PMCPMC6935125
OpenAlexW2997851731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.