Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31881876›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

The cost-effectiveness of screening tools used in the diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: a modelled analysis.

Patrick Berrigan, Gail Andrew, James N Reynolds, Jennifer D Zwicker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick BerriganSchool of Public Policy, University of Calgary, 906 8th Avenue SW, 5th Floor, Calgary, Alberta, T2P 1H9, Canada. patrick.berrigan@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3750-7978
Gail AndrewFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 5th Floor, 11405 - 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada.
James N ReynoldsDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Botterell Hall, Room 563, 18 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Jennifer D ZwickerSchool of Public Policy, University of Calgary, 906 8th Avenue SW, 5th Floor, Calgary, Alberta, T2P 1H9, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Kids Brain Health Network NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) is characterized by physical and neurological abnormalities resulting from prenatal alcohol exposure. Though diagnosis may help improve patient outcomes, the diagnostic process can be costly. Subsequently, screening children suspected of FASD prior to diagnostic testing has been suggested, to avoid administering testing to children who are unlikely to receive a diagnosis. The present study set out to assess the cost-effectiveness of currently recommended FASD screening tools.

methodsThe screenings tools evaluated were chosen from Children's Healthcare Canada's National Screening Toolkit for Children and Youth Identified and Potentially Affected by FASD and include meconium testing of fatty acid ethyl esters (meconium testing) and the neurobehavioral screening tool (NST). An economic model was constructed to assess cost-effectiveness. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of findings. Costs reflect 2017 Canadian dollars and the perspective is the public healthcare system.

resultsBoth screening tools evaluated resulted in reduced costs and fewer diagnosed years of life than a no screening strategy in which all children suspected of FASD receive diagnostic testing. The model predicts that screening newborns with meconium testing results in a reduced cost of $89,186 per 100 individuals screened and 38 fewer diagnosed years of life by age 18, corresponding to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $2359. Screening children with the NST resulted in a reduced cost of $183,895 per 100 individuals screened and 77 fewer diagnosed years of life by age 18, corresponding to an ICER of $2390.

conclusionFindings suggest that screening is associated with less use of healthcare recourses but also fewer years of life with an FASD diagnosis over a no screening strategy. Since diagnosis can be key to children receiving timely and appropriate health and educational services, cost-savings must be weighed against the fewer years of life with a diagnosis associated with screening.

Indexed as

CanadaChildCost-Benefit AnalysisFetal Alcohol Spectrum DisordersHumansMass ScreeningModels, EconomicCost-effectiveness analysisFetal alcohol spectrum disorderScreening

Identifiers

PMID31881876
PMCPMC6935188
OpenAlexW2997752540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.