Trial reportBMC cancer2019
Retrospective cohort study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05266820 (TACTIC), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
TACTIC: a Phase II Study of TAS-102 Monotherapy and Thalidomide Plus TAS-102 as Third-line Therapy and Beyond in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- TAS-102 plus bevacizumab versus TAS-102 alone for metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil-Containing Combinations in Colorectal Cancer and Other Advanced Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review.The oncologist · 2024Pooled it
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Trifluridine/Tipiracil plus Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from Real-World Series.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Pooled it
- A Comparison of Bevacizumab Plus TAS-102 and TAS-102 Monotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Phase II Study of Irinotecan, Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus Bevacizumab as a Later-line Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): a prospective single-center explorative study.British journal of cancer · 2024Trial
- Biweekly TAS-102 and bevacizumab as third-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer: a phase II, multicenter, clinical trial (TAS-CC4 study).International journal of clinical oncology · 2022Trial
- Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC1602): A multicenter phase II trial.Cancer medicine · 2021Trial
- Combination of TAS-102 and bevacizumab as third-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: TAS-CC3 study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2021Trial
- Article
- Real-world outcomes of trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study from Turkey.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- AGMT mCRC Registry Third-Line and Beyond: a multicentric real-world platform with integrated imaging and biosample database for later-line metastatic colorectal cancer.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- A real-world study of Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) combined with bevacizumab as the late-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Quantitative cancer-immunity cycle modeling for predicting disease progression in advanced metastatic colorectal cancer.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Renal impairment as a risk factor for chemotherapy induced neutropenia in the treatment of trifluridine/thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor plus bevacizumab.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Combining moderate dosage of Bevacizumab with TAS-102 provides longer progression-free time in refractory metastatic colorectal Cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- Cachexia and efficiency of trifluridine/thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor + bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Innovations in colorectal cancer treatment: trifluridine and tipiracil with bevacizumab for improved outcomes - a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab across different subgroups of patients with refractory colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Ecancermedicalscience · 2024Article
- Bevacizumab mitigates codon-specific effects of trifluridine/tipiracil on efficacy outcome parameters in metastatic colorectal cancer.ESMO open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA previous phase I/II C-TASK FORCE study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) showed promising activity with an acceptable toxicity profile. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab compared with trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated mCRC in clinical settings.
methodsRecords of patients with mCRC refractory to standard therapies who initiated trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab from January 2016 to March 2018 or trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy from June 2014 to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed at our institution.
resultsTotally, 60 patients received trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab and 66 received trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy. All patients had previously received standard chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.3-5.1] in the trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab group and 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.8-2.6) in the trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy group [hazards ratio (HR) 0.69; 95% CI 0.48-0.99]. PFS rate at 16 weeks was 46.6% for the trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab group and 33.9% for the trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy group. Although a relatively higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was observed in the trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab group than that in the other group (50.0% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.371), the incidence of febrile neutropenia was not high (3.3% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.444).
conclusionsIn real-world settings, trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab prolonged PFS and helped achieve higher 16-week PFS rate compared with trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated mCRC with manageable toxicities.
trial registrationRetrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.