Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31881819›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Topological structure analysis of chromatin interaction networks.

Juris Viksna, Gatis Melkus, Edgars Celms, Kārlis Čerāns, Karlis Freivalds, Paulis Kikusts, Lelde Lace, Mārtiņš Opmanis, Darta Rituma, Peteris Rucevskis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Juris ViksnaInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Latvia, Rainis boulevard 29, Riga, LV-1459, Latvia. juris.viksna@lumii.lv.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2283-2978
Gatis MelkusInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Latvia, Rainis boulevard 29, Riga, LV-1459, Latvia.
Edgars CelmsInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Latvia, Rainis boulevard 29, Riga, LV-1459, Latvia.
Kārlis ČerānsInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Latvia, Rainis boulevard 29, Riga, LV-1459, Latvia.
Karlis FreivaldsInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Latvia, Rainis boulevard 29, Riga, LV-1459, Latvia.
Paulis KikustsInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Latvia, Rainis boulevard 29, Riga, LV-1459, Latvia.
Lelde LaceInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Latvia, Rainis boulevard 29, Riga, LV-1459, Latvia.
Mārtiņš OpmanisInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Latvia, Rainis boulevard 29, Riga, LV-1459, Latvia.
Darta RitumaInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Latvia, Rainis boulevard 29, Riga, LV-1459, Latvia.
Peteris RucevskisInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Latvia, Rainis boulevard 29, Riga, LV-1459, Latvia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent Hi-C technologies for chromosome conformation capture allow to understand a broad spectrum of functional interactions between genome elements. Although significant progress has been made into analysis of Hi-C data to identify biologically significant features, many questions still remain open, in particular regarding potential biological significance of various topological features that are characteristic for chromatin interaction networks.

resultsIt has been previously observed that promoter capture Hi-C (PCHi-C) interaction networks tend to separate easily into well-defined connected components that can be related to certain biological functionality, however, such evidence was based on manual analysis and was limited. Here we present a novel method for analysis of chromatin interaction networks aimed towards identifying characteristic topological features of interaction graphs and confirming their potential significance in chromatin architecture. Our method automatically identifies all connected components with an assigned significance score above a given threshold. These components can be subjected afterwards to different assessment methods for their biological role and/or significance. The method was applied to the largest PCHi-C data set available to date that contains interactions for 17 haematopoietic cell types. The results demonstrate strong evidence of well-pronounced component structure of chromatin interaction networks and provide some characterisation of this component structure. We also performed an indicative assessment of potential biological significance of identified network components with the results confirming that the network components can be related to specific biological functionality.

conclusionsThe obtained results show that the topological structure of chromatin interaction networks can be well described in terms of isolated connected components of the network and that formation of these components can be often explained by biological features of functionally related gene modules. The presented method allows automatic identification of all such components and evaluation of their significance in PCHi-C dataset for 17 haematopoietic cell types. The method can be adapted for exploration of other chromatin interaction data sets that include information about sufficiently large number of different cell types, and, in principle, also for analysis of other kinds of cell type-specific networks.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAlgorithmsChromatinGene Expression RegulationHematopoiesisHumansPromoter Regions, GeneticChromatinCell type specificityChromatin interaction networksFunctionally related modulesGraph topology

Identifiers

PMID31881819
PMCPMC6933681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.