Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31881724›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2019

Contribution of Non-

Antonio Morata, Carlos Escott, María Antonia Bañuelos, Iris Loira, Juan Manuel Del Fresno, Carmen González, José Antonio Suárez-Lepe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Biocontrol UsingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Genetic diversity of non-Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Synergetic Effect ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Antonio MorataenotecUPM, Department of Chemistry and Food Technology. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Carlos EscottenotecUPM, Department of Chemistry and Food Technology. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
María Antonia BañuelosenotecUPM, Department of Biotecnology. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Iris LoiraenotecUPM, Department of Chemistry and Food Technology. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Juan Manuel Del FresnoenotecUPM, Department of Chemistry and Food Technology. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Carmen GonzálezenotecUPM, Department of Chemistry and Food Technology. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
José Antonio Suárez-LepeenotecUPM, Department of Chemistry and Food Technology. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freshness, although it is a concept difficult to define in wines, can be understood as a combination of different circumstances. Organolepticwise, bluish red, floral and fruity, more acidic and full-bodied wines, are perceived as younger and fresher by consumers. In traditional winemaking processes, these attributes are hard to boost if no other technology or biotechnology is involved. In this regard, the right selection of yeast strains plays an important role in meeting these parameters and obtaining wines with fresher profiles. Another approach in getting fresh wines is through the use of novel non-thermal technologies during winemaking. Herein, the contributions of non-

Indexed as

Food QualityFermentationWineYeastsbiopolymersfreshnessnon-Saccharomycessensory qualitywineyeast metabolites

Identifiers

PMID31881724
PMCPMC7022396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.