Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31881702›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2019

A Pilot Randomized Crossover Trial Assessing the Safety and Short-Term Effects of Walnut Consumption by Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Pilar Sanchis, Marilisa Molina, Francisco Berga, Elena Muñoz, Regina Fortuny, Antonia Costa-Bauzá, Felix Grases, Juan Manuel Buades

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of Walnut (Juglans regia L.) on Blood Pressure and Endothelial Function in Adults: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pilar SanchisLaboratory of Renal Lithiasis Research, University of Balearic Islands, Institute of Health Sciences Research [IUNICS-IdISBa], 07122 Palma of Mallorca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8565-1811
Marilisa MolinaNephrology Department, Hospital Son Llàtzer, Institute of Health Sciences Research [IUNICS-IdISBa], 07198 Palma of Mallorca, Spain.
Francisco BergaLaboratory of Renal Lithiasis Research, University of Balearic Islands, Institute of Health Sciences Research [IUNICS-IdISBa], 07122 Palma of Mallorca, Spain.
Elena MuñozALCER Illes Balears (Association for the Fight against Kidney Diseases, Balearic Islands), 07009 Palma, Spain.
Regina FortunyLaboratory Department, Hospital Son Llàtzer, 07198 Palma of Mallorca, Spain.
Antonia Costa-BauzáLaboratory of Renal Lithiasis Research, University of Balearic Islands, Institute of Health Sciences Research [IUNICS-IdISBa], 07122 Palma of Mallorca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0647-4154
Felix GrasesLaboratory of Renal Lithiasis Research, University of Balearic Islands, Institute of Health Sciences Research [IUNICS-IdISBa], 07122 Palma of Mallorca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5636-9139
Juan Manuel BuadesNephrology Department, Hospital Son Llàtzer, Institute of Health Sciences Research [IUNICS-IdISBa], 07198 Palma of Mallorca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6383-6110
Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands · ESHospital Son Llatzer · ES

Funding

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Spanish Government) RTC-2014-2460-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is to assess the safety of daily consumption of walnuts on the physiological levels of phosphorous, potassium, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), and to assess the short-term benefits of this intervention on risk factors associated with cardiovascular events. This led us to perform a prospective, randomized, crossover, pilot clinical trial examined 13 patients with CKD. Subjects were randomly assigned to a diet of 30 g of walnuts per day or the control diet. After 30 days, each group was given a 30-day washout period, and then switched to the alternate diet for 30 days. Urinary and serum levels of phosphorous and potassium, multiple vascular risk factors, and urinary inositol phosphates (InsPs) were measured at baseline and at the end of the intervention period. Our results showed that the walnut dietary supplement led to reduced blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and albumin excretion, but had no effect on the physiological levels of phosphorous, potassium, PTH, and FGF23. This is the first report to show that daily consumption of walnuts by patients with CKD does not alter their physiological levels of phosphorous, potassium, PTH, and FGF23 when included in a sodium-, protein-, phosphate-, and potassium-controlled diet, and it could be an effective strategy for reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with CKD.

Indexed as

DietJuglansNutsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Over StudiesFemaleFibroblast Growth Factor-23Fibroblast Growth FactorsHumansInositol PhosphatesMaleParathyroid HormonePhosphorusFGF23 protein, humanFibroblast Growth Factor-23Fibroblast Growth FactorsInositol PhosphatesParathyroid HormonePhosphorusPotassiumdietary interventionkidney diseasephosphorousphytatewalnuts

Identifiers

PMID31881702
PMCPMC7020056
OpenAlexW2989592670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.