Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31881391›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2020

Improving the quality conduct and efficiency of clinical trials with training: Recommendations for preparedness and qualification of investigators and delegates.

Jimmy Bechtel, Tina Chuck, Annemarie Forrest, Christine Hildebrand, Janette Panhuis, Suzanne R Pattee, Sabrina Comic-Savic, Teresa Swezey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jimmy BechtelSociety for Clinical Research Sites, 7250 Parkway Dr, Suite 405, Hannover, MD 21076, United States of America. Electronic address: jimmy.bechtel@myscrs.org.
Tina ChuckThe Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, 125 Community Dr, Great Neck, NY 11021, United States of America. Electronic address: tchuck@northwell.edu.
Annemarie ForrestClinical Trials Transformation Initiative, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27714, United States of America. Electronic address: annemarie.forrest@duke.edu.
Christine HildebrandAmici Clinical Research, 34 E Somerset St, Raritan, NJ 08869, United States of America. Electronic address: christine.hildebrand@amicicr.com.
Janette PanhuisPopulation Health Research Institute, 237 Barton St E, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada. Electronic address: janette.panhuis@phri.ca.
Suzanne R PatteeUS Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, White Oak, Bldg. 51, Rm. 3328, Silver Spring, MD 20993, United States of America. Electronic address: suzanne.pattee@fda.hhs.gov.
Sabrina Comic-SavicThe Medicines Company, 8 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, NJ 07054, United States of America. Electronic address: sabrina.comic-savic@themedco.com.
Teresa SwezeyClinical Trials Transformation Initiative, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27714, United States of America; Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, 215 Morris St, Durham, NC 27701, United States of America. Electronic address: teresa.swezey@duke.edu.

Funding

Increasing the Quality and Efficiency of Clinical Trials (R18)R18FD005292 · FDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JENNIFER S · 2014 to 2019
$26.8M
Clinical Trials Transformation InitiativeU19FD003800 · FDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CALIFF, ROBERT · 2009 to 2013
$8.5M
FDA HHS R18 FD005292FDA HHS U18 FD005292FDA HHS U19 FD003800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) Investigator Qualification Project addresses the need for a more efficient and effective means of identifying qualified clinical investigators and delegates. Selection of investigators and delegates who are qualified by training and experience to conduct clinical trials is essential to safeguarding protections for study participants and ensuring data quality and integrity. Sponsors generally document investigator qualification through training on the principles of good clinical practice (GCP), as defined by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), adopted by regulatory authorities in the United States, Japan and the European Union. Although these GCP principles provide an important foundation for promoting the conduct of quality clinical trials, the industry standard "one-size-fits-all" GCP training may not fully prepare investigators and delegates for conducting quality clinical trials. Routine GCP training alone may not be sufficient to prepare an inexperienced member of a site team, while repeating such training is unlikely to enhance the qualifications of an experienced researcher. The CTTI project team used findings from qualitative research activities, as well as input from an expert meeting with multiple stakeholders, to identify gaps and redundancies in the current training of investigators and their delegates and recommend practical, action-based solutions. CTTI provides recommendations on how to implement a more efficient and effective means of preparedness and qualification of investigators and delegates, determining whether a site team is a good fit for a particular protocol, and improving the quality of clinical trial conduct.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalQuality ImprovementBiomedical ResearchHumansQualitative ResearchResearch DesignResearch PersonnelClinical trialsGood clinical practiceInvestigator qualificationInvestigator training

Identifiers

PMID31881391
PMCPMC8276623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.