ArticleContemporary clinical trials2020
Improving the quality conduct and efficiency of clinical trials with training: Recommendations for preparedness and qualification of investigators and delegates.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- A study within a trial evaluating supplemental, reinforced risk-based training to reduce implementation barriers in a pediatric multicenter randomized controlled trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Trial
- Bridging the gap in clinical research training: a qualitative study of postgraduate medical students' perceptions of good clinical practice education.Medical education online · 2026Article
- Nurse education on sedation management in ECMO: A small-group training approach.Journal of perioperative practice · 2026Article
- International Stakeholder Guidance for Improving Informativeness of Randomized Clinical Trials.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- An updated review of the SMA clinical trial landscape in the United States: Findings from analysis of recruitment targets on ClinicalTrials.gov and a survey of SMA clinical trial sites on factors affecting site capacity and readiness.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- Beyond GCP: developing a differentiated competency framework for principal investigators in innovative drug clinical trials in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Quality of Drug Clinical Trials in China: A Mixed Methods Research.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2025Article
- Building Pathways to Clinical Research Careers: Partnerships With Academic Programs to Provide Students With Experiential Learning Opportunities in Clinical Research.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2025Article
- Learning from COVID-19: clinical trials, health information technology, and patient mortality.npj health systems · 2025Article
- Enhancing pragmatic competence in investigator-initiated clinical trials: structure and evaluation of the CONSCIOUS II training programme.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Blockchain-enabled quality by design system for clinical trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinical trial outcomes for SLE: what we have and what we need.Lupus science & medicine · 2024Review
- Variability in research culture across busy catheterisation labs in the Asia-Pacific region.AsiaIntervention · 2024Article
- Article
- Factors influencing the quality of acupuncture clinical trials: a qualitative interview of stakeholders.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2023Article
- "How do I keep this live in my mind?" Allied Health Professionals' perspectives of barriers and enablers to implementing good clinical practice principles in research: a qualitative exploration.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Toward a global harmonization of service infrastructure in academic clinical trial units: an international survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Clinical Investigator Training Program (CITP) - A practical and pragmatic approach to conveying clinical investigator competencies and training to busy clinicians.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) Investigator Qualification Project addresses the need for a more efficient and effective means of identifying qualified clinical investigators and delegates. Selection of investigators and delegates who are qualified by training and experience to conduct clinical trials is essential to safeguarding protections for study participants and ensuring data quality and integrity. Sponsors generally document investigator qualification through training on the principles of good clinical practice (GCP), as defined by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), adopted by regulatory authorities in the United States, Japan and the European Union. Although these GCP principles provide an important foundation for promoting the conduct of quality clinical trials, the industry standard "one-size-fits-all" GCP training may not fully prepare investigators and delegates for conducting quality clinical trials. Routine GCP training alone may not be sufficient to prepare an inexperienced member of a site team, while repeating such training is unlikely to enhance the qualifications of an experienced researcher. The CTTI project team used findings from qualitative research activities, as well as input from an expert meeting with multiple stakeholders, to identify gaps and redundancies in the current training of investigators and their delegates and recommend practical, action-based solutions. CTTI provides recommendations on how to implement a more efficient and effective means of preparedness and qualification of investigators and delegates, determining whether a site team is a good fit for a particular protocol, and improving the quality of clinical trial conduct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.