Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31881357›Full record

ReviewBehaviour research and therapy2020

Behavioral and neural processes in counterconditioning: Past and future directions.

Nicole E Keller, Augustin C Hennings, Joseph E Dunsmoor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behaviour research and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Behavioral Training in First-Generation Long-Tailed Macaques (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole E KellerUniversity of Texas at Austin, Institute for Neuroscience, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Augustin C HenningsUniversity of Texas at Austin, Institute for Neuroscience, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Joseph E DunsmoorUniversity of Texas at Austin, Institute for Neuroscience, Austin, TX, 78712, USA; University of Texas at Austin, Department of Psychiatry, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. Electronic address: joseph.dunsmoor@austin.utexas.edu.

Funding

Supplement to: Improving the Control of Fear: Healthy Adults to Pathological AnxietyR00MH106719 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DUNSMOOR, JOSEPH EDWARD · 2017 to 2019
$883k
NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH106719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Counterconditioning refers both to the technique and putative process by which behavior is modified through a new association with a stimulus of an opposite valence. Similar to extinction, counterconditioning is considered a form of inhibition that interferes with the expression of the originally learned response without erasing it. But whereas interest in extinction continues to rise, counterconditioning has received far less attention. Here, we provide an in-depth review of counterconditioning research and detail whether counterconditioning is any more effective than extinction at preventing relapse of the originally learned behavior. We consider the clinical implications of counterconditioning, describe recent neurobiological and neuroimaging research in this area, and consider future avenues in need of further investigation.

Indexed as

AmygdalaAssociation LearningConditioning, PsychologicalExtinction, PsychologicalFearHumansAmygdalaAssociative learningAversive-appetitive interactionsCounterconditioningExtinctionPavlovian conditioningSystematic desensitization

Identifiers

PMID31881357
PMCPMC6983350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.