ArticleBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2020
Outcome of Multiple Myeloma with Chromosome 1q Gain and 1p Deletion after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Propensity Score Matched Analysis.
Article in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Additional copies of 1q negatively impact the outcome of multiple myeloma patients and induce transcriptomic deregulation in malignant plasma cells.Blood cancer journal · 2024Trial
- Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Among Chinese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (CHAMP-MM).Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic impact of monosomy 13 and deletion of 13q in multiple myeloma patients undergoing upfront autologous transplantation.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Patients With Multiple Myeloma With deletion 1p Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2025Article
- Poor prognosis of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients with 1p32.3 deletion in single monoallelic deletion and/or in main clone.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Prognostic Significance of +1q Alterations in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated With Daratumumab-, Elotuzumab-, and Carfilzomib-Based Triplet Regimens: A Multicenter Real-World Analysis of 635 Patients.European journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Dissecting the high-risk property of 1q gain/amplification in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- A predictive risk-scoring model for survival prognosis of multiple myeloma based on gain/amplification of 1q21: Experience in a tertiary hospital in South-Western China.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- The numerous facets of 1q21Oncology letters · 2024Review
- A Risk Stratification System in Myeloma Patients with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.Cancers · 2024Article
- [Application of the Second Revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) in the prognostic assessment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2024Article
- Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma and 1q gain/amplification receiving autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant: the MD Anderson cancer center experience.Blood cancer journal · 2024Article
- Molecular genetic aberrations in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2023Review
- Increasing genomic discovery in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: defining disease biology and its correlation to risk.Annals of hematology · 2022Review
- Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma harboring chromosome 1q gain/amplification in the era of modern therapy.Annals of hematology · 2022Article
- The independent adverse prognostic significance of 1q21 gain/amplification in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- The adverse impact of a gain in chromosome 1q on the prognosis of multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib-based regimens: A retrospective single-center study in China.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Review
- The influence of high-efficiency particulate air filtration on mortality among multiple myeloma patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Chromosome 1q21 abnormalities in multiple myeloma.Blood cancer journal · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The gain/amplification CKS1B gene at chromosome region 1q21 (1q+) is one of the most common genetic aberrations in multiple myeloma (MM). Amplification of CKS1B is frequently associated with the deletion of the CDKN2C gene at chromosome region 1p32 (1p-), which is also associated with inferior outcomes. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the outcomes of patients with 1q+ and/or 1p- after high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). From January 2006 to December 2015, 1491 newly diagnosed patients with MM underwent upfront high-dose therapy and auto-HCT at our institution. Of those, 899 had the fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) data available. FISH was performed at diagnosis and before the start of induction in 686 (76%) patients and after the initiation of induction therapy in 213 (24%) patients. We identified 100 patients with 1q+ and/or 1p- by FISH from the cohort of 899 patients. A control group (n = 287) with diploid cytogenetics and normal FISH panel was selected from the same cohort. From the above 2 cohorts, using a propensity score matched analysis, we identified matched controls for 85 of the 100 patients with 1q+/1p-. Patients were matched for age at auto-HCT, sex, International Staging System stage, induction regimen, creatinine level, disease status at auto-HCT, conditioning regimen, and maintenance therapy. Sixty-seven (79%), 4 (5%), and 14 (16%) patients had 1q+, 1p-, or both 1q+ and 1p-, respectively. There was no significant difference in induction therapy, preparative regimen, or maintenance therapy between the 1q+/1p- and the control group. The median follow-up time for all patients was 29.2 months (range, 0.29 to 84.96). The cumulative incidence of 100-day nonrelapse mortality was 1.2% and 0% for the 1q+/1p- and the control group, respectively. Forty-two patients (50%) in the 1q+/1p- group achieved complete response compared with 40 patients (47%) in the control group. The estimated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 41% and 79% for the 1q+/1p- group and 56% and 86% for the control group. Patients in the 1q+/1p- group were at significantly increased risk of progression or death compared to the control group (hazard ratio [HR], 2.21; confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 4.16; P = .014). No significant association between OS in the 2 groups was observed. The outcome of the 1q+/1p- alone (with no additional high-risk cytogenetics) and the propensity score matched control groups was also compared. Median PFS for the 1q+/1p- alone subgroup was 26.6 months, compared with 38.8 months for the control group (HR, 1.9; CI, 0.9 to 4.08; P = .09). The median OS had not been reached for the 1q+/1p- alone subgroup and was 81.1 months for the control group (HR, 1.25; CI, 0.3 to 4.6; P= .73). 1q+/1p- abnormalities with amplification of CKS1B and deletion ofCDKN2Cgenes were associated with shorter PFS compared with a propensity score matched group of patients with diploid cytogenetics and normal a FISH panel. The outcomes of 1q+/1p- patients with MM have improved with the use of more effective induction, conditioning, and maintenance therapy compared with historical controls, but we still need more effective therapeutic approaches to fully overcome the negative impact of 1q+/1p-.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.