ArticlePloS one2019
Predicting breast cancer risk using personal health data and machine learning models.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cancer Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning for Supporting Early Cancer Diagnosis in Symptomatic Patients: A Systematic Review of Model Types.Cancer medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Development and performance of female breast cancer incidence risk prediction models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Risk assessment tools for women with breast atypia: A systematic review.American journal of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of prediction models for risk of breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Cataract surgery risk stratification models: a systematic review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Pooled it
- Breast cancer risk prediction using machine learning: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- An Assessment of the Predictive Performance of Current Machine Learning-Based Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models: Systematic Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2022Pooled it
- Creation and Verification of a Machine Learning-based Model for Predicting Breast Cancer Risk in Patients with BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Tools in Myocardial Infarction Prognosis: Evaluating the Performance of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models.Current cardiology reviews · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a machine learning model for cardiovascular disease risk prediction in type 2 diabetes patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A machine learning approach to predict self-efficacy in breast cancer survivors.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Machine learning algorithms predict breast cancer incidence risk: a data-driven retrospective study based on biochemical biomarkers.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Classification of Breast Cancer Risk Based on Clinical Data.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Extracting Knowledge from Machine Learning Models to Diagnose Breast Cancer.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The value of multiparametric MRI radiomics and machine learning in predicting preoperative Ki-67 expression level in breast cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- The role of CTGF and MFG-E8 in the prognosis assessment of SCAP: a study combining machine learning and nomogram analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Cardioprotection for radiation-induced heart disease in breast cancer patients.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Explainable Machine Learning to Predict Treatment Response in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Analysis of risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with renal insufficiency combined withPeerJ · 2025Article
- Does machine learning improve prediction accuracy of the Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score? A contemporary Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network cohort study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Among women, breast cancer is a leading cause of death. Breast cancer risk predictions can inform screening and preventative actions. Previous works found that adding inputs to the widely-used Gail model improved its ability to predict breast cancer risk. However, these models used simple statistical architectures and the additional inputs were derived from costly and / or invasive procedures. By contrast, we developed machine learning models that used highly accessible personal health data to predict five-year breast cancer risk. We created machine learning models using only the Gail model inputs and models using both Gail model inputs and additional personal health data relevant to breast cancer risk. For both sets of inputs, six machine learning models were trained and evaluated on the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial data set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve metric quantified each model's performance. Since this data set has a small percentage of positive breast cancer cases, we also reported sensitivity, specificity, and precision. We used Delong tests (p < 0.05) to compare the testing data set performance of each machine learning model to that of the Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Tool (BCRAT), an implementation of the Gail model. None of the machine learning models with only BCRAT inputs were significantly stronger than the BCRAT. However, the logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, and neural network models with the broader set of inputs were all significantly stronger than the BCRAT. These results suggest that relative to the BCRAT, additional easy-to-obtain personal health inputs can improve five-year breast cancer risk prediction. Our models could be used as non-invasive and cost-effective risk stratification tools to increase early breast cancer detection and prevention, motivating both immediate actions like screening and long-term preventative measures such as hormone replacement therapy and chemoprevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.