SynthesisPloS one2019
Prediction of poor outcome after hypoxic-ischemic brain injury by diffusion-weighted imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- BONBID-HIE 2023: Lesion Segmentation Challenge in BOston Neonatal Brain Injury Data for Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026Article
- Update on hypoxic-ischemic brain injury: Prognosis and management.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- Complete Neurological Recovery Following Suicidal Near-Hanging: A Case Report From Ethiopia.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2026Article
- Quantitative and Radiological Assessment of Post-cardiac-Arrest Comatose Patients with Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
- BOston Neonatal Brain Injury Data for Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (BONBID-HIE): I. MRI and Lesion Labeling.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Intimate Partner Violence-Related Brain Injury: Unmasking and Addressing the Gaps.Journal of neurotrauma · 2024Review
- Regional Distribution of Brain Injury After Cardiac Arrest: Clinical and Electrographic Correlates.Neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of the neurological outcome following hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI) remains difficult. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can detect acute and subacute brain abnormalities following global cerebral hypoxia. Therefore, DWI can be used to predict the outcomes of HIBI. To this end, we searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies that examine the diagnostic accuracy of DWI in predicting HIBI outcomes in adult patients between January1995 and September 2019. Next, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis using the Meta-DiSc and several complementary techniques. Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 28 studies were included with 98 data subsets. The overall sensitivity and specificity, with 95% confidence interval, were 0.613(0.599-0.628) and 0.958(0.947-0.967), respectively, and the area under the curve was 0.9090. Significant heterogeneity among the included studies and a threshold effect were observed (p<0.001). Different positive indices were the major sources for the heterogeneity, followed by the anatomical region examined, both of which significantly affected the prognostic accuracy. In conclusion, we demonstrated that DWI can be an instrumental modality in predicting the outcome of HIBI with good prognostic accuracy. However, the lack of clear and generally accepted positive indices limits its clinical application. Therefore, using more reliable positive indices and combining DWI with other clinical predictors may improve the diagnostic accuracy of HIBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.