Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31880964›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2020

Phase III Study of Adjuvant Ipilimumab (3 or 10 mg/kg) Versus High-Dose Interferon Alfa-2b for Resected High-Risk Melanoma: North American Intergroup E1609.

Ahmad A Tarhini, Sandra J Lee, F Stephen Hodi, Uma N M Rao, Gary I Cohen, Omid Hamid, Laura F Hutchins, Jeffrey A Sosman, Harriett M Kluger, Zeynep Eroglu and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Patient-reported tolerability of adjuvant ipilimumab (3 or 10 mg/kg) versus high-dose interferon alfa-2b for resected high-risk stage III-IV melanoma in phase III trial E1609.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 17 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmad A TarhiniH. Lee Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Sandra J LeeHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
F Stephen HodiDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Uma N M RaoUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Gary I CohenGreater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
Omid HamidAngeles Clinic & Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA.
Laura F HutchinsUniversity of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR.
Jeffrey A SosmanNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Harriett M KlugerYale University, New Haven, CT.
Zeynep ErogluH. Lee Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Henry B KoonCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
Donald P LawrenceMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Kari L KendraOhio State University, Columbus, OH.
David R MinorSutter-California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.
Carrie B LeeUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Mark R AlbertiniUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Lawrence E FlahertyWayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI.
Teresa M PetrellaOdette Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Howard StreicherNational Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Vernon K SondakH. Lee Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
John M KirkwoodUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USAngeles Clinic and Research Institute · USCalifornia Pacific Medical Center · USCase Western Reserve University · USGreater Baltimore Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNational Cancer Institute · USNorthwestern University · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Arkansas at Little Rock · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USWayne State University · USYale University · US

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
Statistics CoreU10CA180794 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI PAUL J CATALANO, CONSTANTINE A. GATSONIS · 2014 to 2026
$111.2M
NCIC Clinical Trials Group - Canadian Collaborating Clinical Trials NetworkU10CA180863 · NCI · QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON · PI Janet Ellen Dancey · 2014 to 2026
$40.4M
Montefiore Academic Community NCORP ProgramUG1CA189859 · NCI · MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER (BRONX, NY) · PI Balazs Halmos, Della Makower · 2014 to 2026
$10.8M
CWRU Case Comprehensive Cancer Center NCTN Lead Academic Participating SiteU10CA180853 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GERDS, AARON THOMAS, MACHTAY, MITCHELL · 2014 to 2018
$6.2M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareU10CA180867 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BURSTEIN, HAROLD JOHN, KIBEL, ADAM S · 2014 to 2018
$6.2M
National Clinical Trials Network Research at the University of WisconsinUG1CA233277 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Lisa M Barroilhet, Andrew M. Baschnagel · 2019 to 2026
$4.9M
NCI NCTN-Network Lead Academic Site at UPCIU10CA180844 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BRUFSKY, ADAM M, EDWARDS, ROBERT PAGE · 2014 to 2018
$4.5M
NCI National Clinical Trials Network – Network Lead Academic Participating SiteUG1CA233163 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FLAHERTY, LAWRENCE E, SHIELDS, ANTHONY FRANK · 2019 to 2025
$3.5M
UNC Lead Academic Participating SiteUG1CA233373 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CAREY, LISA A, DEES, ELIZABETH CLAIRE · 2019 to 2025
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180794NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180799NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180802NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180835NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180844NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180847NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180853NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180863NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180867NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189859NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233163NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233277NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePhase III adjuvant trials have reported significant benefits in both relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for high-dose interferon alfa (HDI) and ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg (ipi10). E1609 evaluated the safety and efficacy of ipilimumab at 3 mg/kg (ipi3) and ipi10 versus HDI. PATIENTS AND

methodsE1609 was a phase III trial in patients with resected cutaneous melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition stage IIIB, IIIC, M1a, or M1b). It had 2 coprimary end points: OS and RFS. A 2-step hierarchic approach first evaluated ipi3 versus HDI followed by ipi10 versus HDI.

resultsBetween May 2011 and August 2014, 1,670 adult patients were centrally randomly assigned (1:1:1) to ipi3 (n = 523), HDI (n = 636), or ipi10 (n = 511). Treatment-related adverse events grade ≥ 3 occurred in 37% of patients receiving ipi3, 79% receiving HDI, and 58% receiving ipi10, with adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation in 35%, 20%, and 54%, respectively. Comparison of ipi3 versus HDI used an intent-to-treat analysis of concurrently randomly assigned patient cases (n = 1,051) and showed significant OS difference in favor of ipi3 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95.6% repeated CI, 0.61 to 0.99;

conclusionAdjuvant therapy with ipi3 benefits survival versus HDI; for the first time to our knowledge in melanoma adjuvant therapy, E1609 has demonstrated a significant improvement in OS against an active control regimen. The currently approved adjuvant ipilimumab dose (ipi10) was more toxic and not superior in efficacy to HDI.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalChemotherapy, AdjuvantCutaneous Malignant MelanomaDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInterferon alpha-2IpilimumabMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalInterferon alpha-2Ipilimumab

Identifiers

PMID31880964
PMCPMC7030886
OpenAlexW2997351648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.