Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31880839›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2020

Bioavailability Assessment of Metals in Freshwater Environments: A Historical Review.

William Adams, Ronny Blust, Robert Dwyer, David Mount, Eirik Nordheim, Patricio H Rodriguez, Doug Spry

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

William AdamsRed Cap Consulting, Lake Point, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7937-7852
Ronny BlustUniversity of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Robert DwyerRobert Dwyer, International Copper Association, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA.
David MountMid-Continent Ecology Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7356-2616
Eirik NordheimEuropean Aluminium, Brussels, Belgium.
Patricio H RodriguezPHR Consulting, Santiago, Chile.
Doug SpryEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many metals (aluminum, cadmium, cobalt, copper, nickel, lead, zinc) are widely studied environmental contaminants because of their ubiquity, potential toxicity to aquatic life, and tendency for toxicity to vary widely as a function of water chemistry. The interactions between metal and water chemistry influence metal "bioavailability," an index of the rate and extent to which the metal reaches the site of toxic action. The implications of metal bioavailability for ecological risk assessment are large, with as much as a 100-fold variability across a range of water chemistries in surface waters. Beginning as early as the 1930s, considerable research effort was expended toward documenting and understanding metal bioavailability as a function of total and dissolved metal, water hardness, natural organic matter, pH, and other water characteristics. The understanding of these factors and improvements in both analytical and computational chemistry led to the development of modeling approaches intended to describe and predict the relationship between water chemistry and metal toxicity, including the free ion activity model, the gill surface interaction model, the biotic ligand model, and additional derivatives and regression models that arose from similar knowledge. The arc of these scientific advances can also be traced through the evolution of the US Environmental Protection Agency's ambient water quality criteria over the last 50 yr, from guidance in the "Green Book" (1968) to metal-specific criteria produced in the last decade. Through time, water quality criteria in many jurisdictions have incorporated increasingly sophisticated means of addressing metal bioavailability. The present review discusses the history of scientific understanding of metal bioavailability and the development and application of models to incorporate this knowledge into regulatory practice. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;39:48-59. © 2019 SETAC.

Indexed as

AnimalsAquatic OrganismsBiological AvailabilityCongresses as TopicEnvironmental MonitoringFresh WaterGillsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyLigandsMetalsModels, BiologicalWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater QualityLigandsMetalsWater Pollutants, ChemicalBioavailabilityMetalWater quality models

Identifiers

PMID31880839
PMCPMC11382335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.