Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31880801›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Association of State Opioid Duration Limits With Postoperative Opioid Prescribing.

Sunil Agarwal, John D Bryan, Hsou Mei Hu, Jay S Lee, Kao-Ping Chua, Rebecca L Haffajee, Chad M Brummett, Michael J Englesbe, Jennifer F Waljee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Variability in discharge opioid prescribing practices for children: a historical cohort study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Utilization of a National Registry to influence opioid prescribing behavior after hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sunil AgarwalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
John D BryanMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Ann Arbor.
Hsou Mei HuMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Ann Arbor.
Jay S LeeMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Ann Arbor.
Kao-Ping ChuaSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Rebecca L HaffajeeDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
Chad M BrummettMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Ann Arbor.
Michael J EnglesbeMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Ann Arbor.
Jennifer F WaljeeMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, Ann Arbor.
Michigan Medicine · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USEmory University · US

Funding

University of Michigan Fibromyalgia CORTP50AR070600 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BRUMMETT, CHAD M, CLAUW, DANIEL J · 2016 to 2021
$7.4M
oPIOIDS: Prevention of Iatrogenic Opioid Dependence after SurgeryR01DA042859 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BRUMMETT, CHAD M, WALJEE, JENNIFER FILIP · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
Using Default Opioid Prescription Settings to Limit Excessive Opioid Prescribing to Adolescents and Young AdultsK08DA048110 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHUA, KAO-PING · 2019 to 2023
$983k
NIAMS NIH HHS P50 AR070600NIDA NIH HHS K08 DA048110NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Since the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published opioid prescribing guidelines in March 2016, 31 states have implemented legislation to restrict the duration of opioid prescriptions for acute pain. However, the association of these policies with the amount of opioid prescribed following surgery remains unknown. Objective: To examine the association of opioid prescribing duration limits with postoperative opioid prescribing in Massachusetts and Connecticut, the first 2 states to implement limits after March 2016. Design, Setting, and Participants: This interrupted time series analysis and cross-sectional study examined immediate level and slope changes in monthly outcomes after prescribing limit implementation in Massachusetts and Connecticut. These states implemented 7-day limits on initial opioid prescriptions on March 14, 2016, and July 1, 2016, respectively. Using the 2014 to 2017 IBM MarketScan Research Database, 16 281 opioid-naive adults in these states who filled a prescription within 3 days of surgery between July 1, 2014, and November 30, 2017, were identified. Data were analyzed from December 2018 to June 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the prescription size in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) for the initial postoperative opioid prescription (one 5/325 mg hydrocodone-acetaminophen pill = 5 OMEs). Secondary outcomes included days supplied in the initial prescription and the proportion of initial prescriptions exceeding a 7-day supply. Results: In total, 16 281 opioid-naive patients (9708 [59.6%] female; median [interquartile range] age range, 45-54 [35-44 to 55-64] years) undergoing surgical procedures were included. In Massachusetts, there were 5340 and 5435 patients in the preimplementation and postimplementation periods, respectively. In Connecticut, there were 2869 and 2637 patients in the preimplementation and postimplementation periods, respectively. Limit implementation in Massachusetts was associated with an immediate mean level decrease in prescription size (-38 OMEs [95% CI, -44 to -32 OMEs]) and with a mean decrease in slope (-1.5 OMEs/mo [95% CI, -2.1 to -0.9 OMEs/mo]). Implementation was also associated with an immediate mean level decrease in days supplied (-0.4 days [95% CI, -0.6 to -0.2 days]) and the proportion of prescriptions exceeding a 7-day supply (-5.9 percentage points [95% CI, -7.9 to -3.9 percentage points]). In contrast, limit implementation in Connecticut was not associated with level or slope changes in any outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: Opioid prescribing duration limits had a variable association with postoperative opioid prescribing in Massachusetts and Connecticut. The mean opioid prescription size filled, days supplied, and prescribing exceeding a 7-day supply decreased after limit implementation in Massachusetts only. Given the potential differences in policy dissemination and uptake, efforts to reduce opioid prescribing should also include surgeon education and evidence-based prescribing recommendations.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesics, OpioidConnecticutDrug Administration ScheduleDrug and Narcotic ControlFemaleHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedPostoperative PainPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription Drug DiversionSubstance-Related DisordersAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID31880801
PMCPMC6991309
OpenAlexW2998312965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.