Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31880569›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2020

A Spectral Approach to Model-Based Noninvasive Intracranial Pressure Estimation.

Rohan Jaishankar, Andrea Fanelli, Aristotelis Filippidis, Thai Vu, James Holsapple, Thomas Heldt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Adaptive Maximal Blood Flow Velocity Estimation From Transcranial Doppler Echos.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rohan Jaishankar
Andrea Fanelli
Aristotelis Filippidis
Thai Vu
James Holsapple
Thomas Heldt
Boston University · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Noninvasive Determination of Intracranial Pressure in Pediatric PatientsR21NS084264 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HELDT, THOMAS · 2014 to 2015
$445k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS084264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntracranial pressure (ICP) normally ranges from 5 to 15 mmHg. Elevation in ICP is an important clinical indicator of neurological injury, and ICP is therefore monitored routinely in several neurological conditions to guide diagnosis and treatment decisions. Current measurement modalities for ICP monitoring are highly invasive, largely limiting the measurement to critically ill patients. An accurate noninvasive method to estimate ICP would dramatically expand the pool of patients that could benefit from this cranial vital sign.

methodsThis article presents a spectral approach to model-based ICP estimation from arterial blood pressure (ABP) and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) measurements. The model captures the relationship between the ABP, CBFV, and ICP waveforms and utilizes a second-order model of the cerebral vasculature to estimate ICP.

resultsThe estimation approach was validated on two separate clinical datasets, one recorded from thirteen pediatric patients with a total duration of around seven hours, and the other recorded from five adult patients, one hour and 48 minutes in total duration. The algorithm was shown to have an accuracy (mean error) of 0.4 mmHg and -1.5 mmHg, and a precision (standard deviation of the error) of 5.1 mmHg and 4.3 mmHg, in estimating mean ICP (range of 1.3 mmHg to 24.8 mmHg) on the pediatric and adult data, respectively. These results are comparable to previous results and within the clinically relevant range. Additionally, the accuracy and precision in estimating the pulse pressure of ICP on a beat-by-beat basis were found to be 1.3 mmHg and 2.9 mmHg respectively.

conclusionThese contributions take a step towards realizing the goal of implementing a real-time noninvasive ICP estimation modality in a clinical setting, to enable accurate clinical-decision making while overcoming the drawbacks of the invasive ICP modalities.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultAlgorithmsBlood PressureBrain InjuriesCerebrovascular CirculationHumansIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureMonitoring, PhysiologicUltrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial

Identifiers

PMID31880569
PMCPMC10615348
OpenAlexW2998661903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.